Suppr超能文献

大麻素、大麻及基于大麻的药物治疗疼痛:随机对照试验的系统评价。

Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicine for pain management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

Cochrane Pain, Palliative, and Supportive Care Review Groups, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pain. 2021 Jul 1;162(Suppl 1):S45-S66. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001929.

Abstract

Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicines (CBMs) are increasingly used to manage pain, with limited understanding of their efficacy and safety. We summarised efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of these types of drugs for treating pain using randomised controlled trials: in people of any age, with any type of pain, and for any treatment duration. Primary outcomes were 30% and 50% reduction in pain intensity, and AEs. We assessed risk of bias of included studies, and the overall quality of evidence using GRADE. Studies of <7 and >7 days treatment duration were analysed separately. We included 36 studies (7217 participants) delivering cannabinoids (8 studies), cannabis (6 studies), and CBM (22 studies); all had high and/or uncertain risk of bias. Evidence of benefit was found for cannabis <7 days (risk difference 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.46; 2 trials, 231 patients, very low-quality evidence) and nabiximols >7 days (risk difference 0.06, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.12; 6 trials, 1484 patients, very low-quality evidence). No other beneficial effects were found for other types of cannabinoids, cannabis, or CBM in our primary analyses; 81% of subgroup analyses were negative. Cannabis, nabiximols, and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol had more AEs than control. Studies in this field have unclear or high risk of bias, and outcomes had GRADE rating of low- or very low-quality evidence. We have little confidence in the estimates of effect. The evidence neither supports nor refutes claims of efficacy and safety for cannabinoids, cannabis, or CBM in the management of pain.

摘要

大麻素、大麻和大麻基药物(CBM)越来越多地被用于治疗疼痛,但对其疗效和安全性的了解有限。我们综述了这些类型的药物治疗疼痛的疗效和不良事件(AE)的随机对照试验:包括任何年龄、任何类型疼痛和任何治疗持续时间的人群。主要结局是疼痛强度降低 30%和 50%,以及 AE。我们评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 评估证据的总体质量。分析了治疗持续时间<7 天和>7 天的研究。我们纳入了 36 项研究(7217 名参与者),提供大麻素(8 项研究)、大麻(6 项研究)和 CBM(22 项研究);所有研究的偏倚风险都很高和/或不确定。<7 天的大麻素证据表明有效(风险差异 0.33,95%置信区间 0.20-0.46;2 项试验,231 名患者,极低质量证据),而>7 天的纳比西妥单抗证据表明有效(风险差异 0.06,95%置信区间 0.01-0.12;6 项试验,1484 名患者,极低质量证据)。在我们的主要分析中,没有发现其他类型的大麻素、大麻或 CBM 有其他有益的效果;81%的亚组分析结果为阴性。大麻、纳比西妥单抗和Δ9-四氢大麻酚比对照组有更多的不良事件。该领域的研究存在不确定或高偏倚风险,结局的 GRADE 评级为低质量或极低质量证据。我们对效果的估计几乎没有信心。证据既不支持也不反驳大麻素、大麻或 CBM 在疼痛管理中的疗效和安全性的说法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验