文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

患者和医疗保健专业人员对技术辅助糖尿病自我管理教育的看法。定性系统评价。

Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review.

机构信息

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 17;15(8):e0237647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237647. eCollection 2020.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0237647
PMID:32804989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7430746/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes self-management education is a key aspect in the long-term management of type 2 diabetes. The patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspective on the use of technology-assisted DSME has yet to be studied. Hence, the objective of this study was to better understand the factors that facilitate or hinder the adoptions of such education by adults with type 2 diabetes and their HCPs. METHODS: We systematically searched five databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and PsycINFO) until August 2019. The search included qualitative and mixed-method studies that reported the views of patients and HCPs regarding features, uses, and implementations of technology-assisted DSME. Data were synthesized through an inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 13 articles were included, involving 242 patients, ranging from 18 to 81 years and included web-based, mobile application, digital versatile disc (DVD), virtual reality or telehealth interventions. Patients and HCPs had mixed views towards features of the technology-assisted interventions, with patients' personal qualities and HCPs' concerns affecting uses of the interventions. Patients generally preferred technologies that were easy to access, use, and apply and that had reliable information. Patients' ambitions motivated them, and personal attributes such as poor competence with technology, poor literacy, and language barriers acted as barriers. Patients especially liked the peer support that they received but did not like it when there was no regulation of advice on these platforms. HCPs believed that while the interventions were useful to patients, they faced difficulties with integration into their clinical workflows. CONCLUSION: This review explored the features of technology-assisted diabetes self-management education interventions that enhanced positive patient engagements and the negative aspects of both the platforms and the target groups. Technical support and training will be effective in managing these concerns and ensuring meaningful use of these platforms.

摘要

简介:糖尿病自我管理教育是 2 型糖尿病长期管理的关键方面。患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对技术辅助 DSME 的使用的看法尚未得到研究。因此,本研究的目的是更好地了解促进或阻碍成年 2 型糖尿病患者及其 HCP 采用这种教育的因素。

方法:我们系统地搜索了五个数据库(Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science Core Collection 和 PsycINFO),直到 2019 年 8 月。该搜索包括定性和混合方法研究,报告了患者和 HCP 对技术辅助 DSME 的功能、用途和实施的看法。数据通过归纳主题分析进行综合。

结果:共纳入 13 篇文章,涉及 242 名患者,年龄从 18 岁到 81 岁不等,包括基于网络、移动应用、数字多功能光盘(DVD)、虚拟现实或远程医疗干预。患者和 HCP 对技术辅助干预措施的功能有不同的看法,患者的个人素质和 HCP 的担忧影响了干预措施的使用。患者通常更喜欢易于访问、使用和应用的技术,并且具有可靠的信息。患者的抱负激发了他们的积极性,而技术能力差、读写能力差和语言障碍等个人属性则成为障碍。患者特别喜欢他们所获得的同伴支持,但不喜欢这些平台上没有对建议进行监管的情况。HCP 认为,虽然这些干预措施对患者有用,但他们在将其整合到临床工作流程中时遇到了困难。

结论:本综述探讨了增强患者积极参与的技术辅助糖尿病自我管理教育干预措施的功能,以及这些平台和目标群体的负面方面。技术支持和培训将有效地解决这些问题,并确保这些平台的有意义使用。

相似文献

[1]
Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review.

PLoS One. 2020-8-17

[2]
Health care professionals' views towards self-management and self-management education for people with type 2 diabetes.

BMJ Open. 2019-7-16

[3]
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009

[4]
Health Care Professionals' Experiences and Perspectives on Using Telehealth for Home-based Palliative Care: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-3-29

[5]
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1

[6]
Healthcare professionals' views of group structured education for people with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes.

Diabet Med. 2018-7

[7]
Differences in perspectives regarding diabetes management between health care providers and patients.

Transl Behav Med. 2018-5-23

[8]
Healthcare Professionals' Views of Factors Influencing Diabetes Self-Management and the Utility of a mHealth Application and Its Features to Support Self-Care.

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022

[9]
Experiences of health professionals towards using mobile electrocardiogram (ECG) technology: A qualitative systematic review.

J Clin Nurs. 2023-7

[10]
Mismatch between health-care professionals' and patients' views on a diabetes patient decision aid: a qualitative study.

Health Expect. 2016-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Perceptions of a comprehensive telehealth intervention in patients with persistently poor type 2 diabetes control.

J Clin Transl Sci. 2025-6-25

[2]
Digital Health Technology in Diabetes Management in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Narrative Review of the Current Scenario and Future Outlook.

Diabetes Ther. 2025-3

[3]
Exploring the Feasibility of Digital Voice Assistants for Delivery of a Home-Based Exercise Intervention in Older Adults With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR Aging. 2024-9-13

[4]
Greek School Nurses' Confidence With Diabetes Devices.

Cureus. 2024-8-1

[5]
Exploring factors affecting the acceptance of fall detection technology among older adults and their families: a content analysis.

BMC Geriatr. 2024-8-20

[6]
Understanding the preferences of young adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus with regard to diabetes self-management education: a qualitative study.

BMJ Open. 2024-7-4

[7]
Empowering patients in primary care: a qualitative exploration of the usability and utility of an online diabetes self-management tool.

BMC Prim Care. 2024-4-11

[8]
Experiences with telemedicine-based follow-up of chronic conditions: the views of patients and health personnel enrolled in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-3-14

[9]
Artificial Intelligence in Health Care-Understanding Patient Information Needs and Designing Comprehensible Transparency: Qualitative Study.

JMIR AI. 2023

[10]
Pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing a complex telemedicine-based intervention with usual care in patients with chronic conditions.

Eur J Health Econ. 2024-9

本文引用的文献

[1]
What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients?

NPJ Digit Med. 2020-1-13

[2]
Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods.

BMJ Glob Health. 2019-1-25

[3]
Acceptance and Resistance of New Digital Technologies in Medicine: Qualitative Study.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2018-12-4

[4]
What maximizes the effectiveness and implementation of technology-based interventions to support healthcare professional practice? A systematic literature review.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018-11-7

[5]
Experiences of Using Web-Based and Mobile Technologies to Support Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study.

JMIR Diabetes. 2018-5-11

[6]
Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among US adults in 2016 and 2017: population based study.

BMJ. 2018-9-4

[7]
Redesigning Hospital Diabetes Education: A Qualitative Evaluation With Nursing Teams.

J Nurs Care Qual. 2019

[8]
Diabetes Care in the Digital Era: a Synoptic Overview.

Curr Diab Rep. 2018-5-10

[9]
Experiences and Opinions of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Regarding a Self-Regulation-Based eHealth Intervention Targeting Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018-5-10

[10]
Service user preferences for diabetes education in remote and rural areas of the Highlands and Islands of Scotland.

Rural Remote Health. 2018-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索