• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达比加群的依从性及达比加群相关胃肠道不适对真实世界实践的影响。

Adherence to dabigatran and the influence of dabigatran-induced gastrointestinal discomfort in the real-world practice.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jan 15;323:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.032. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.032
PMID:32805331
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dabigatran-induced gastrointestinal discomfort (DGID) is an important factor influencing the adherence to dabigatran. We investigated the incidence and risk factors of DGID and its impact on the adherence and persistence to dabigatran.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled the patients prescribed with dabigatran in 10 tertiary hospitals of the South Korea. The adherence was assessed using the percentage of the prescribed doses of the medication presumably taken by the patient (PDT by pill count). We evaluated the relationship between DGID and the baseline GI symptoms or the previous GI disease history using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 474 patients (mean age 67.8 ± 9.3 years, male 68.6%, and mean CHADS-VASc score 2.2 ± 1.2) were enrolled. The adherence assessed by the PDT was 93.5 ± 5.5% at 1-month and 96.4 ± 8.4% at 6-months among the persistent patients. During the 6-month follow-up, 82 (18.1%) patients discontinued dabigatran, and the most common reason for dabigatran discontinuation was DGID (49, 59.8%). Sixty-eight (14.3%) patients experienced DGID, and there was no difference in the clinical factors between those with or without DGID. Among the patients who experienced DGID, 42 discontinued dabigatran (61.8%). In a multivariate analysis, DGID was the only predictor of dabigatran discontinuation and a low adherence.

CONCLUSION

Overall adherence of dabigatran was excellent, but those with DGID showed low adherence and persistence. Furthermore, it was challenging to predict DGID by clinical parameters. Therefore, it is recommended to follow the patients closely to check for DGID when prescribing dabigatran.

摘要

背景

达比加群引起的胃肠道不适(DGID)是影响达比加群依从性的重要因素。我们调查了 DGID 的发生率和危险因素及其对达比加群依从性和持久性的影响。

方法

我们前瞻性地招募了韩国 10 家三级医院处方达比加群的患者。通过患者可能服用的药物剂量的百分比(通过药丸计数评估的 PDT)来评估依从性。我们使用问卷评估 DGID 与基线胃肠道症状或既往胃肠道疾病史之间的关系。

结果

共纳入 474 例患者(平均年龄 67.8±9.3 岁,男性 68.6%,平均 CHADS-VASc 评分 2.2±1.2)。在持续用药的患者中,1 个月时 PDT 评估的依从性为 93.5±5.5%,6 个月时为 96.4±8.4%。在 6 个月的随访期间,82 例(18.1%)患者停用了达比加群,停用达比加群的最常见原因是 DGID(49 例,占 59.8%)。68 例(14.3%)患者出现 DGID,DGID 患者与无 DGID 患者的临床因素无差异。在出现 DGID 的患者中,有 42 例停用了达比加群(61.8%)。多变量分析显示,DGID 是达比加群停药和低依从性的唯一预测因素。

结论

达比加群的总体依从性非常好,但 DGID 患者的依从性和持久性较低。此外,通过临床参数预测 DGID 具有挑战性。因此,建议在开具达比加群时密切关注患者,以检查 DGID。

相似文献

1
Adherence to dabigatran and the influence of dabigatran-induced gastrointestinal discomfort in the real-world practice.达比加群的依从性及达比加群相关胃肠道不适对真实世界实践的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jan 15;323:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.032. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
2
Adherence and outcomes to direct oral anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from the veterans health administration.心房颤动患者使用直接口服抗凝剂的依从性及治疗结果:退伍军人健康管理局的研究发现
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Sep 2;17(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0671-6.
3
Real-world persistence and adherence to oral anticoagulation for stroke risk reduction in patients with atrial fibrillation.真实世界中,为降低房颤患者卒中风险,患者对口服抗凝药物的持续应用及依从性。
Europace. 2016 Aug;18(8):1150-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv421. Epub 2016 Jan 31.
4
Comparison of Treatment Persistence with Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Competing Risk Analysis in the French National Health Care Databases.比较达比加群或利伐沙班与维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在房颤患者中的治疗持久性:法国国家卫生保健数据库中的竞争风险分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Jan;38(1):6-18. doi: 10.1002/phar.2046. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
5
Factors associated with abrupt discontinuation of dabigatran therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation in Malaysia.马来西亚心房颤动患者达比加群治疗突然中断的相关因素。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Oct;38(5):1182-90. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0350-1. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
6
Treatment Persistence and Discontinuation with Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran, and Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in the United States.在美国,利伐沙班、达比加群和华法林用于非瓣膜性心房颤动患者预防卒中的治疗持续性和停药情况。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0157769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157769. eCollection 2016.
7
Persistence and outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.非维生素K拮抗剂类口服抗凝药与华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的疗效持久性及转归
J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):1839-1846. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14797. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
8
Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in 'real-world' patients with atrial fibrillation.达比加群与醋硝香豆素在“真实世界”房颤患者中的有效性和安全性比较
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1319-27. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv397. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
9
Thromboembolic events, bleeding, and drug discontinuation in patients with atrial fibrillation on anticoagulation: a prospective hospital-based registry.心房颤动患者抗凝治疗中的血栓栓塞事件、出血及药物停用情况:一项基于医院的前瞻性登记研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Dec 9;16(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0438-5.
10
Real-world adherence for direct oral anticoagulants in a newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation cohort: does the dosing interval matter?新诊断房颤队列中直接口服抗凝剂的真实世界依从性:给药间隔重要吗?
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Mar 19;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1033-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and Predictors of Nonadherence to Direct Oral Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝治疗不依从的患病率及预测因素
TH Open. 2023 Sep 27;7(3):e270-e279. doi: 10.1055/a-2161-0928. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios.临床实践及复杂情况下接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗患者的管理
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 13;12(18):5955. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185955.
3
Adherence and clinical outcomes for twice-daily versus once-daily dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: Is dosing frequency important?
非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在房颤患者中每日两次与每日一次给药的依从性和临床结局:给药频率重要吗?
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0283478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283478. eCollection 2023.