Suppr超能文献

12000 例转移性乳腺癌女性的年龄相关姑息治疗提供情况:2008-2016 年多中心 ESME-MBC 队列分析。

Palliative care delivery according to age in 12,000 women with metastatic breast cancer: Analysis in the multicentre ESME-MBC cohort 2008-2016.

机构信息

University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, Epicene Team, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France; Department of Palliative Medicine, CHU Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.

University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, Biostatistic Team, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2020 Sep;137:240-249. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often require inpatient palliative care (IPC). However, mounting evidence suggests age-related disparities in palliative care delivery. This study aimed to assess the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of IPC delivery, as well as the influence of age.

METHODS

The national ESME (Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical)-MBC cohort includes consecutive MBC patients treated in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. ICD-10 palliative care coding was used for IPC identification.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 12,375 patients, 5093 (41.2%) of whom were aged 65 or over. The median follow-up was 41.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.5-42.5). The CIF of IPC was 10.3% (95% CI, 10.2-10.4) and 24.8% (95% CI, 24.7-24.8) at 2 and 8 years, respectively. At 2 years, among triple-negative patients, young patients (<65 yo) had a higher CIF of IPC than older patients after adjusting for cancer characteristics, centre and period (65+/<65: β = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.01). Among other tumour sub-types, older patients received short-term IPC more frequently than young patients (65+/<65: β = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03). At 8 years, outside large centres, IPC was delivered less frequently to older patients adjusted to cancer characteristics and period (65+/<65: β = -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01).

CONCLUSION

We found a relatively low CIF of IPC and that age influenced IPC delivery. Young triple-negative and older non-triple-negative patients needed more short-term IPCs. Older patients diagnosed outside large centres received less long-term IPC. These findings highlight the need for a wider implementation of IPC facilities and for more age-specific interventions.

摘要

介绍

转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者通常需要住院姑息治疗(IPC)。然而,越来越多的证据表明姑息治疗的提供存在与年龄相关的差异。本研究旨在评估 IPC 提供的累积发生率函数(CIF),以及年龄的影响。

方法

国家 ESME(Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical)-MBC 队列包括在 18 个法国综合癌症中心接受治疗的连续 MBC 患者。使用 ICD-10 姑息治疗编码来识别 IPC。

结果

我们的分析包括 12375 名患者,其中 5093 名(41.2%)年龄在 65 岁或以上。中位随访时间为 41.5 个月(95%置信区间[CI],40.5-42.5)。IPC 的 CIF 分别为 2 年和 8 年时的 10.3%(95%CI,10.2-10.4)和 24.8%(95%CI,24.7-24.8)。在 2 年时,在三阴性患者中,年轻患者(<65 岁)在调整癌症特征、中心和时期后,IPC 的 CIF 高于老年患者(65+/<65:β=-0.05;95%CI,-0.08 至-0.01)。在其他肿瘤亚型中,老年患者比年轻患者更频繁地接受短期 IPC(65+/<65:β=0.02;95%CI,0.01 至 0.03)。在 8 年时,在大中心之外,调整癌症特征和时期后,IPC 向老年患者提供的频率较低(65+/<65:β=-0.03;95%CI,-0.06 至-0.01)。

结论

我们发现 IPC 的 CIF 相对较低,并且年龄会影响 IPC 的提供。年轻的三阴性和年长的非三阴性患者需要更多的短期 IPC。在大中心外诊断的老年患者接受的长期 IPC 较少。这些发现强调了需要更广泛地实施 IPC 设施,并需要更多针对年龄的干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验