• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者安全管理中医疗差错的优先级排序:使用区间值直觉模糊集的框架

Prioritization of Medical Errors in Patient Safety Management: Framework Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets.

作者信息

Kalender Zeynep Tugce, Tozan Hakan, Vayvay Ozalp

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Marmara University, 34722 Istanbul, Turkey.

School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, 34810 Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;8(3):265. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030265.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare8030265
PMID:32806625
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7551010/
Abstract

Medical errors negatively affect patients, healthcare professionals, and healthcare establishments. Therefore, all healthcare service members should be attentive to medical errors. Research has revealed that most medical errors are caused by the system, rather than individuals. In this context, guaranteeing patient safety and preventing medical faults appear to be basic elements of quality in healthcare services. Healthcare institutions can create internal regulations and follow-up plans for patient safety. While this is beneficial for the dissemination of patient safety culture, it poses difficulties in terms of auditing. On the other hand, the lack of a standard patient safety management system, has led to great variation in the quality of the provided service among hospitals. Therefore, this study aims to create an index system to create a standard system for patient safety by classifying medical errors. Due to the complex nature of healthcare and its processes, interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy logic is used in the proposed index system. Medical errors are prioritized, based on the index scores that are generated by the proposed model. Because of this systematic study, not only can the awareness of patient safety perception be increased in health institutions, but their present situation can also be displayed, on the basis of each indicator. It is expected that the outcomes of this study will motivate institutions to identify and prioritize their future improvements in the patient safety context.

摘要

医疗差错会对患者、医护人员和医疗机构产生负面影响。因此,所有医疗服务人员都应关注医疗差错。研究表明,大多数医疗差错是由系统造成的,而非个人原因。在此背景下,保障患者安全和预防医疗失误似乎是医疗服务质量的基本要素。医疗机构可以制定患者安全的内部规章制度和后续计划。虽然这有利于患者安全文化的传播,但在审计方面存在困难。另一方面,缺乏标准的患者安全管理系统导致医院提供的服务质量存在很大差异。因此,本研究旨在创建一个指标体系,通过对医疗差错进行分类来建立患者安全的标准体系。由于医疗保健及其流程的复杂性,在所提出的指标体系中使用了区间值直觉模糊逻辑。根据所提出模型生成的指标得分对医疗差错进行优先级排序。通过这项系统性研究,不仅可以提高医疗机构对患者安全认知的意识,还能根据各项指标展示其现状。预计本研究的结果将促使各机构在患者安全方面识别并优先考虑其未来的改进措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2db4/7551010/6827878b6fe0/healthcare-08-00265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2db4/7551010/6827878b6fe0/healthcare-08-00265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2db4/7551010/6827878b6fe0/healthcare-08-00265-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prioritization of Medical Errors in Patient Safety Management: Framework Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets.患者安全管理中医疗差错的优先级排序:使用区间值直觉模糊集的框架
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;8(3):265. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030265.
2
Multicriteria decision-making approach with hesitant interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets.基于犹豫区间值直觉模糊集的多准则决策方法
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:868515. doi: 10.1155/2014/868515. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
3
Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy rough set system over a novel conflict distance measure with application to decision-making.基于一种新型冲突距离测度的区间值直觉模糊粗糙集系统及其在决策中的应用
MethodsX. 2023 Jan 13;10:102012. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102012. eCollection 2023.
4
An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on an improved score function.一种基于改进得分函数的区间值直觉模糊TOPSIS方法。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Dec 25;2013:879089. doi: 10.1155/2013/879089. eCollection 2013.
5
Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Based on Bonferroni Mean Operators under Cubic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Environment.基于立方直觉模糊集环境下Bonferroni均值算子的多属性决策
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Jan 17;20(1):65. doi: 10.3390/e20010065.
6
Evaluation about the performance of E-government based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set.基于区间值直觉模糊集的电子政务绩效评估
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 23;2014:234241. doi: 10.1155/2014/234241. eCollection 2014.
7
Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MADM method based on TOPSIS and grey correlation analysis.基于TOPSIS和灰色关联分析的区间值直觉模糊多属性决策方法
Math Biosci Eng. 2020 Aug 18;17(5):5584-5603. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020300.
8
A new intuitionistic fuzzy rule-based decision-making system for an operating system process scheduler.一种用于操作系统进程调度器的基于直觉模糊规则的新型决策系统。
Springerplus. 2016 Sep 13;5(1):1547. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3216-z. eCollection 2016.
9
Assessment of healthcare waste treatment methods using an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy double normalization-based multiple aggregation approach.基于区间值直觉模糊双归一化的多重聚合方法对医疗废物处理方法的评估
Environ Dev Sustain. 2023 Apr 24:1-28. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03154-8.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-based hybrid risk estimation system (ERES) in cardiac surgery: Supplementary insights from the ASA score analysis.心脏手术中基于机器学习的混合风险评估系统(ERES):美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分分析的补充见解
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jun 23;4(6):e0000889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000889. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Entropy-Based Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Investment Decision Optimization of Large-Scale Projects.基于熵的模糊 TOPSIS 方法在大型项目投资决策优化中的应用
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 18;2022:4381293. doi: 10.1155/2022/4381293. eCollection 2022.
3
A Novel Integration of IF-DEMATEL and TOPSIS for the Classifier Selection Problem in Assistive Technology Adoption for People with Dementia.

本文引用的文献

1
A New Decision Model Approach for Health Technology Assessment and A Case Study for Dialysis Alternatives in Turkey.一种新的决策模型方法在卫生技术评估中的应用及土耳其透析方案选择的实例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 21;17(10):3608. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103608.
2
Influence of Workload on Primary Care Nurses' Health and Burnout, Patients' Safety, and Quality of Care: Integrative Review.工作量对基层护理护士健康与职业倦怠、患者安全及护理质量的影响:综合综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jan 3;8(1):12. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010012.
3
Measuring and Assessing Healthcare Organisational Culture in the England's National Health Service: A Snapshot of Current Tools and Tool Use.
一种新颖的 IF-DEMATEL 和 TOPSIS 集成方法在辅助技术采用中对痴呆症患者的分类器选择问题。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 20;19(3):1133. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031133.
4
An Investigation of Human Errors in Medication Adverse Event Improvement Priority Using a Hybrid Approach.使用混合方法对药物不良事件改善优先级中的人为错误进行的调查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 9;9(4):442. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040442.
衡量与评估英国国民医疗服务体系中的医疗组织文化:当前工具及工具使用情况概览
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Nov 1;7(4):127. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040127.
4
The Role of Governments in the Implementation of Patient Safety and Patient Safety Incident Reporting in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study.政府在印度尼西亚患者安全实施及患者安全事件报告中的作用:一项定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Apr 24;7(2):64. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7020064.
5
Service quality benchmarking via a novel approach based on fuzzy ELECTRE III and IPA: an empirical case involving the Italian public healthcare context.基于模糊 ELECTRE III 和 IPA 的新型方法进行服务质量基准测试:涉及意大利公共医疗保健背景的实证案例。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Mar;22(1):106-120. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9424-4. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Medication Without Harm: WHO's Third Global Patient Safety Challenge.无害用药:世界卫生组织的第三次全球患者安全挑战
Lancet. 2017 Apr 29;389(10080):1680-1681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31047-4.
7
Your Health Care May Kill You: Medical Errors.你的医疗保健可能会要了你的命:医疗差错。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:13-17.
8
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
9
Application of Bow-tie methodology to improve patient safety.应用蝴蝶结模型方法提高患者安全。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 May 9;29(4):425-40. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2015-0121.
10
A Fuzzy-Based Decision Support Model for Selecting the Best Dialyser Flux in Haemodialysis.一种基于模糊的血液透析最佳透析器通量选择决策支持模型。
J Healthc Eng. 2015;6(3):303-24.