Vera Ruth, Gómez María Luisa, Ayuso Juan Ramón, Figueras Joan, García-Alfonso Pilar, Martínez Virginia, Lacasta Adelaida, Ruiz-Casado Ana, Safont María José, Aparicio Jorge, Campos Juan Manuel, Cámara Juan Carlos, Martín-Richard Marta, Montagut Clara, Pericay Carles, Vieitez Jose María, Falcó Esther, Jorge Mónica, Marín Miguel, Salgado Mercedes, Viúdez Antonio
Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Instituto de investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra (IdISNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Pathology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;12(8):2259. doi: 10.3390/cancers12082259.
: The prospective phase IV AVAMET study was undertaken to correlate response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST)-defined response rates with computed tomography-based morphological criteria (CTMC) and pathological response after liver resection of colorectal cancer metastases. : Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0/1 and histologically-confirmed colon or rectal adenocarcinoma with measurable liver metastases. Preoperative treatment was bevacizumab (7.5 mg on day 1) + XELOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m, capecitabine 1000 mg/m bid on days 1-14 q3w). After three cycles, response was evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Patients who were progression-free and metastasectomy candidates received one cycle of XELOX before undergoing surgery 3-5 weeks later, followed by four cycles of bevacizumab + XELOX. : A total of 83 patients entered the study; 68 were eligible for RECIST, 67 for CTMC, and 51 for pathological response evaluation. Of these patients, 49% had a complete or partial RECIST response, 91% had an optimal or incomplete CTMC response, and 81% had a complete or major pathological response. CTMC response predicted 37 of 41 pathological responses versus 23 of 41 responses predicted using RECIST ( = 0.008). Kappa coefficients indicated a lack of correlation between the results of RECIST and morphological responses and between morphological and pathological response rates. Conclusion: CTMC may represent a better marker of pathological response to bevacizumab + XELOX than RECIST in patients with potentially-resectable CRC liver metastases.
前瞻性IV期AVAMET研究旨在将实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)定义的缓解率与基于计算机断层扫描的形态学标准(CTMC)以及结直肠癌肝转移灶肝切除术后的病理缓解情况相关联。符合条件的患者年龄≥18岁,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态为0/1,组织学确诊为结肠或直肠腺癌且有可测量的肝转移灶。术前治疗方案为贝伐单抗(第1天7.5mg)+XELOX方案(奥沙利铂130mg/m²,卡培他滨1000mg/m²,第1 - 14天每日2次,每3周重复)。三个周期后,由多学科团队评估疗效。病情无进展且适合进行转移灶切除的患者在3 - 5周后接受手术前接受一个周期的XELOX方案,随后接受四个周期的贝伐单抗+XELOX方案。共有83例患者进入研究;68例符合RECIST评估标准,67例符合CTMC评估标准,51例符合病理缓解评估标准。在这些患者中,49%达到RECIST标准的完全或部分缓解,91%达到CTMC标准的最佳或不完全缓解,81%达到完全或主要病理缓解。CTMC标准预测了41例病理缓解中的37例,而RECIST标准预测了41例中的23例(P = 0.008)。kappa系数表明RECIST结果与形态学缓解之间以及形态学与病理缓解率之间缺乏相关性。结论:对于潜在可切除的结直肠癌肝转移患者,CTMC可能比RECIST更能代表对贝伐单抗+XELOX方案的病理缓解标志物。