Mumma Bryn E, Casey Scott D, Dang Robert K, Polen Michelle K, Kaur Jasmanpreet C, Rodrigo John, Tancredi Daniel J, Narverud Robert A, Amsterdam Ezra A, Tran Nam
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;76(5):566-579. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.06.047. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
Our objective is to describe the rates of diagnostic reclassification between conventional cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and between combined and sex-specific hs-cTnT thresholds in adult emergency department (ED) patients in the United States.
We conducted a prospective, single-center, before-and-after, observational study of ED patients aged 18 years or older undergoing single or serial cardiac troponin testing in the ED for any reason before and after hs-cTnT implementation. Conventional cTnI and hs-cTnT results were obtained from a laboratory quality assurance database. Combined and sex-specific thresholds were the published 99th percentile upper reference limits for each assay. Cases underwent physician adjudication using the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Diagnostic reclassification occurred when a patient received a diagnosis of myocardial infarction or myocardial injury with one assay but not the other assay. Our primary outcome was diagnostic reclassification between the conventional cTnI and hs-cTnT assays. Diagnostic reclassification probabilities were assessed with sample proportions and 95% confidence intervals for binomial data.
We studied 1,016 patients (506 men [50%]; median age 60 years [25th, 75th percentiles 49, 71]). Between the conventional cTnI and hs-cTnT assays, 6 patients (0.6%; 95% confidence interval 0.2% to 1.3%) underwent diagnostic reclassification regarding myocardial infarction (5/6 reclassified as no myocardial infarction) and 166 patients (16%; 95% confidence interval 14% to 19%) underwent diagnostic reclassification regarding myocardial injury (154/166 reclassified as having myocardial injury) by hs-cTnT.
Compared with conventional cTnI, the hs-cTnT assay resulted in no clinically relevant change in myocardial infarction diagnoses but substantially more myocardial injury diagnoses.
我们的目的是描述在美国成年急诊科(ED)患者中,传统心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)与高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T(hs-cTnT)之间以及联合和性别特异性hs-cTnT阈值之间的诊断重新分类率。
我们对年龄在18岁及以上、因任何原因在急诊科接受hs-cTnT实施前后单次或系列心肌肌钙蛋白检测的成年急诊科患者进行了一项前瞻性、单中心、前后对照的观察性研究。传统cTnI和hs-cTnT结果来自实验室质量保证数据库。联合和性别特异性阈值是每种检测方法公布的第99百分位数的参考上限。病例采用心肌梗死的第四次通用定义由医生进行判定。当患者用一种检测方法被诊断为心肌梗死或心肌损伤而用另一种检测方法未被诊断时,发生诊断重新分类。我们的主要结局是传统cTnI和hs-cTnT检测方法之间的诊断重新分类。诊断重新分类概率用样本比例和二项式数据的95%置信区间进行评估。
我们研究了1016例患者(506例男性[50%];年龄中位数60岁[第25、75百分位数49、71])。在传统cTnI和hs-cTnT检测方法之间,6例患者(0.6%;95%置信区间0.2%至1.3%)在心肌梗死方面发生诊断重新分类(5/6重新分类为无心肌梗死),166例患者(16%;95%置信区间14%至19%)在心肌损伤方面通过hs-cTnT发生诊断重新分类(154/166重新分类为有心肌损伤)。
与传统cTnI相比,hs-cTnT检测方法在心肌梗死诊断方面未导致临床相关变化,但在心肌损伤诊断方面显著增加。