Stricto Sensu Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL) and University Pitágoras Unopar (UNOPAR), Londrina, Brazil; Laboratory of Research in Respiratory Physiotherapy (LFIP), Department of Physiotherapy, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil; Burn Treatment Center, University Hospital of State University of Londrina (HU-UEL), Londrina, Brazil.
Burn Treatment Center, University Hospital of State University of Londrina (HU-UEL), Londrina, Brazil.
Burns. 2020 Nov;46(7):1540-1547. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
Despite its clinical relevance in several populations, there is no evidence on applicability of the 6-min walk test (6MWT) in burned subjects.
To verify the applicability and reproducibility of the 6MWT in burned individuals and to analyze patients' performance in this test at hospital discharge.
In a cross-sectional study, burned individuals performed two 6MWT at hospital discharge, according to international standardization. In addition to walked distance, physiological and symptomatic variables were collected. Clinical history and demographic data were also recorded.
One hundred individuals were evaluated (70 men, 10 [6-18]% total body surface area burned). There was excellent agreement between the two 6MWT (ICC = 0.97). However, 73% of subjects increased the walked distance in the second test (23 [-9-47]m or 5 [-2-10]%; P = 0.001). Considering the best 6MWT, the walked distance was 488 [396-718]m (80 [65-92]%pred), and 51% of the individuals had limited functional exercise capacity. Additionally, participants without lower limb involvement presented better 6MWT than others (P < 0.0001).
The 6MWT was applicable, well tolerated and reproducible at hospital discharge in burned individuals. However, there was considerable learning effect between the first and second test. Finally, the reduced exercise capacity observed reinforces need for early rehabilitation in this population.
尽管在多个人群中具有临床相关性,但在烧伤患者中,6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)的适用性尚无证据。
验证 6MWT 在烧伤患者中的适用性和可重复性,并分析患者在出院时的测试表现。
在一项横断面研究中,烧伤患者根据国际标准化方案在出院时进行两次 6MWT。除了步行距离外,还收集了生理和症状变量。还记录了临床病史和人口统计学数据。
共评估了 100 名患者(70 名男性,10%[6%-18%]总体表烧伤面积)。两次 6MWT 之间具有极好的一致性(ICC=0.97)。然而,73%的患者在第二次测试中增加了步行距离(23[9-47]m 或 5[2-10%];P=0.001)。考虑到最佳的 6MWT,步行距离为 488[396-718]m(80[65%-92%]预计值),并且 51%的患者运动功能受限。此外,无下肢受累的参与者比其他参与者的 6MWT 表现更好(P<0.0001)。
6MWT 在烧伤患者出院时是适用的、耐受良好且可重复的。然而,第一次和第二次测试之间存在相当大的学习效应。最后,观察到的运动能力下降强化了该人群早期康复的必要性。