Rural Clinical School, Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Feb;30(1):167-176. doi: 10.1111/inm.12769. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
Despite an increased burden from chronic mental health conditions, access to effective mental health services in rural and remote areas is limited, and these services remain spatially undefined. We examine the spatial availability of mental health nurses across local government areas in Australia and identify gaps in mental health service delivery capacity in a finer-grained level than the state/territory data. A spatial distribution of mental health nurses was conducted. We utilized the 2017 National Health Workforce Dataset which was aggregated to LGA level based on the 2018 Australian Bureau Statistics (ABS) Data. The availability of mental health nurses was measured using the full time equivalent (FTE) rates per 100 000 population. We calculated the proportion of LGAs with zero total FTE rates based on remoteness categories. We also compared the mean of total FTE rates based on remoteness categories using analysis of variance. A spatial distribution of mental health nurses was visualized using GIS software for total FTE rates. Our analysis included 544 LGA across Australia, with 24.8% being defined as remote and very remote. The mean total FTE for mental health nurses per 100 000 populations is 56.6 (±132.2) with a median of 17.4 (IQR: 61.8). A wide standard deviation reflects unequal distribution of mental health nurses across LGAs. The availability of total FTE rates for mental health nurses per 100 000 populations is significantly lower in remote and very remote LGAs in comparison with major cities. As many as 35.1% of LGAs across Australia have no FTE for mental health nurses with 46% are remote and very remote. Our study reflects the existing unequal distribution of mental health nurses between metropolitan/urban setting and rural and remote areas. We suggest three broad strategies to address these spatial inequities: improving supply and data information systems; revisiting task-shifting strategies, retraining the existing health workforce to develop skills necessary for mental health care to rural and remote communities; and incorporating the provision of mental health services within expanding innovative delivery models including consumer-led, telemedicine and community-based groups.
尽管慢性心理健康状况带来的负担增加,但农村和偏远地区获得有效心理健康服务的机会有限,这些服务的空间范围仍不明确。我们考察了澳大利亚地方政府区域内精神健康护士的空间可及性,并在比州/地区数据更精细的层面上确定了精神卫生服务提供能力方面的差距。进行了精神健康护士的空间分布分析。我们利用了 2017 年国家卫生劳动力数据集,该数据集根据 2018 年澳大利亚统计局(ABS)数据按地方政府区域进行了汇总。使用每 10 万人的全职等效(FTE)率来衡量精神健康护士的可及性。我们根据偏远程度类别计算了 FTE 总数为零的地方政府区域的比例。我们还使用方差分析比较了基于偏远程度类别的 FTE 总数平均值。使用 GIS 软件可视化了精神健康护士的总 FTE 率的空间分布。我们的分析包括澳大利亚的 544 个地方政府区域,其中 24.8%被定义为偏远和极偏远地区。每 10 万人的精神健康护士总 FTE 平均值为 56.6(±132.2),中位数为 17.4(IQR:61.8)。较大的标准差反映了地方政府区域之间精神健康护士分布不均。与主要城市相比,偏远和极偏远地区每 10 万人的精神健康护士总 FTE 可用性明显较低。澳大利亚多达 35.1%的地方政府区域没有精神健康护士的 FTE,其中 46%是偏远和极偏远地区。我们的研究反映了大都市/城市环境与农村和偏远地区之间精神健康护士的现有分布不均。我们建议采取以下三种广泛的策略来解决这些空间不平等问题:改善供应和数据信息系统;重新审视任务转移策略,对现有卫生工作者进行再培训,以发展为农村和偏远社区提供精神卫生保健所需的技能;并将精神卫生服务纳入扩大的创新服务模式,包括以消费者为导向、远程医疗和社区为基础的团体。