• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个未分化的急诊科胸痛人群中,主动脉夹层检测风险评分的分布如何?

What is the distribution of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score in an undifferentiated emergency department chest pain population?

机构信息

Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Oct;32(5):872-874. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13603. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.13603
PMID:32808448
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the distribution of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADDRS) in undifferentiated chest pain patients.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of adult patients presenting to the ED with non-traumatic chest pain.

RESULTS

Of 139 patients studied, more than 75% of patients has an ADDRS ≥1, mainly because of the report of severe pain. There were no aortic dissections. In patients with non-specific chest pain, testing driven by the ADDRS protocol would have seen a 280% increase in d-dimer testing and 2200% increase in computed tomography aortogram rates.

CONCLUSION

Widespread use of the ADDRS and its investigation protocol cannot be supported.

摘要

目的

确定非创伤性胸痛患者中主动脉夹层检测风险评分(ADDRS)的分布。

方法

对因非创伤性胸痛而到急诊科就诊的成年患者进行前瞻性观察性研究。

结果

在研究的 139 名患者中,超过 75%的患者的 ADDRS≥1,主要是因为报告了严重疼痛。没有发生主动脉夹层。对于非特异性胸痛患者,根据 ADDRS 方案进行的检测会导致 D-二聚体检测增加 280%,计算机断层主动脉造影检测增加 2200%。

结论

不能支持广泛使用 ADDRS 及其调查方案。

相似文献

1
What is the distribution of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score in an undifferentiated emergency department chest pain population?在一个未分化的急诊科胸痛人群中,主动脉夹层检测风险评分的分布如何?
Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Oct;32(5):872-874. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13603. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
Clinical profile of patients of acute aortic dissection presenting to the ED without chest pain.急诊科收治的无胸痛急性主动脉夹层患者的临床特征
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;35(4):599-601. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.037. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
3
What Is the Specificity of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score in a Low-prevalence Population?主动脉夹层检测风险评分在低发人群中的特异性如何?
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):632-638. doi: 10.1111/acem.13634. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
Cost associated with D-Dimer screening for acute aortic dissection.与急性主动脉夹层的 D-二聚体筛查相关的成本。
Adv Ther. 2011 Nov;28(11):1038-44. doi: 10.1007/s12325-011-0069-2. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
5
Aortic dissection presenting as a stroke: a case report.升主动脉夹层导致脑卒中:1 例报告。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Feb 16;44:91. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.44.91.38533. eCollection 2023.
6
High-Risk Chief Complaints I: Chest Pain-The Big Three (an Update).高危主要症状之一:胸痛——三大典型症状(更新版)
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2020 May;38(2):453-498. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2020.01.009.
7
Diagnosis of Aortic Dissection in Emergency Department Patients is Rare.急诊科患者中主动脉夹层的诊断很少见。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;16(5):629-31. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.6.25752. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
Horner's syndrome in a patient presenting with chest pain.一名胸痛患者出现霍纳综合征。
Neth J Med. 2015 Jul;73(6):293-5.
9
Acute Aortic Dissection and Intramural Hematoma: A Systematic Review.急性主动脉夹层与主动脉壁内血肿:系统综述。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 16;316(7):754-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10026.
10
Chest pain in a 60-year-old man.一名60岁男性的胸痛。
R I Med J (2013). 2015 May 1;98(5):30-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nomogram to differentiate between aortic dissection and non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.用于鉴别主动脉夹层与非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征的列线图:一项回顾性队列研究
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Apr;11(2):457-466. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-935.