• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Outcomes of the five times sittostand test could determine lower limb functions of ambulatory people with spinal cord injury only when assessed without hands.只有在不使用手的情况下评估,五次坐立站起测试的结果才能确定有下肢运动功能的脊髓损伤患者的下肢功能。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 May;45(3):402-409. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1803658. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
Ability of sit-to-stand with hands reflects neurological and functional impairments in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.借助双手从坐姿到站立的能力反映了脊髓损伤的非卧床个体的神经和功能损伤。
Spinal Cord. 2018 Mar;56(3):232-238. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0012-8. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
The use of lower limb loading ability as an indicator for independence and safety in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.将下肢负重能力作为脊髓损伤步行者独立和安全的指标。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Feb;57(1):85-91. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06333-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
4
Reliability and validity of three functional tests in ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury.三种功能性测试在脊髓损伤门诊患者中的可靠性和有效性。
Spinal Cord. 2013 Mar;51(3):214-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.126. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
5
Five times sit-to-stand test for ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a psychometric study on the effects of arm placements.五次坐站测试在脊髓损伤的非卧床个体中的应用:关于手臂摆放位置影响的心理测量学研究。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Mar;58(3):356-364. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0372-3. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
6
Discriminative ability of the three functional tests in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury who walked with and without ambulatory assistive devices.三种功能测试在脊髓损伤后能独立行走的患者中的鉴别能力,这些患者行走时使用和不使用行走辅助装置。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Mar;37(2):212-7. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000139. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
7
Importance of independent sit-to-stand ability in ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury.独立坐-站能力对脊髓损伤步行患者的重要性。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Aug;53(4):521-526. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04515-4. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
8
Voluntary driven exoskeleton as a new tool for rehabilitation in chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot study.自愿驱动外骨骼作为慢性脊髓损伤康复的新工具:一项试点研究。
Spine J. 2014 Dec 1;14(12):2847-53. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.042. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
9
Against the odds: what to expect in rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury with a neurologically controlled Hybrid Assistive Limb exoskeleton. A subgroup analysis of 55 patients according to age and lesion level.克服重重困难:使用神经控制的混合辅助肢体外骨骼对慢性脊髓损伤进行康复治疗的预期效果。根据年龄和损伤水平对55例患者进行的亚组分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E15. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS171.
10
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the five times sit-to-stand test in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: A six-month prospective cohort study.五项坐立试验在脊髓损伤步行患者中的反应性和最小临床重要差异:一项为期六个月的前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2023 Jan;37(1):109-118. doi: 10.1177/02692155221122672. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and concurrent validity of 30-s and 5-time sit-to-stand tests in older adults with knee osteoarthritis.30秒和5次坐立试验在老年膝骨关节炎患者中的可靠性和同时效度
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Jun;43(6):2035-2045. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06969-6. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
2
The Use of a Single-Time Sit-To-Stand Test in Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury by Primary Health Care Providers.初级保健提供者在脊髓损伤的门诊患者中使用单次坐立测试。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2023 Spring;29(2):84-96. doi: 10.46292/sci22-00021. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
Knee Extensor Muscle Strength to Measure the Ability of Five Times Sit to Stand Independently in Patients with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.膝伸肌力量用于评估不完全性脊髓损伤患者独立五次坐立试验的能力。
Malays J Med Sci. 2022 Oct;29(5):74-82. doi: 10.21315/mjms2022.29.5.8. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Five times sit-to-stand test for ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a psychometric study on the effects of arm placements.五次坐站测试在脊髓损伤的非卧床个体中的应用:关于手臂摆放位置影响的心理测量学研究。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Mar;58(3):356-364. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0372-3. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
2
Two weeks of intensive sit-to-stand training in addition to usual care improves sit-to-stand ability in people who are unable to stand up independently after stroke: a randomised trial.两周的强化坐站训练,联合常规治疗,可改善卒中后无法独立站立人群的坐站能力:一项随机试验。
J Physiother. 2019 Jul;65(3):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
3
Influence of timing protocols and distance covered on the outcomes of the 10-meter walk test.时间方案和距离覆盖对 10 米步行测试结果的影响。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2020 Dec;36(12):1348-1353. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1570577. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
4
Ability of sit-to-stand with hands reflects neurological and functional impairments in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.借助双手从坐姿到站立的能力反映了脊髓损伤的非卧床个体的神经和功能损伤。
Spinal Cord. 2018 Mar;56(3):232-238. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0012-8. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
5
Sit-to-stand test: Performance and determinants across the age-span.坐立试验:不同年龄段的表现及影响因素
Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2010;18(4):235-240. doi: 10.3233/IES-2010-0389.
6
Functional assessments for predicting a risk of multiple falls in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury.预测脊髓损伤独立行走患者多次跌倒风险的功能评估
J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 Jul;38(4):439-45. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000186. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
7
Ability of walking without a walking device in patients with spinal cord injury as determined using data from functional tests.利用功能测试数据确定脊髓损伤患者无需助行器械行走的能力。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Jul;37(4):389-96. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000160. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
8
The five-times-sit-to-stand test: validity, reliability and detectable change in older females.五次坐站测试:老年女性的有效性、可靠性和可检测变化。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012 Aug;24(4):339-44. doi: 10.1007/BF03325265.
9
Reliability and validity of three functional tests in ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury.三种功能性测试在脊髓损伤门诊患者中的可靠性和有效性。
Spinal Cord. 2013 Mar;51(3):214-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.126. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
10
Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者 5 次重复坐站测试的有效性和可变性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2251-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.683479. Epub 2012 May 22.

只有在不使用手的情况下评估,五次坐立站起测试的结果才能确定有下肢运动功能的脊髓损伤患者的下肢功能。

Outcomes of the five times sittostand test could determine lower limb functions of ambulatory people with spinal cord injury only when assessed without hands.

机构信息

School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Improvement of Physical Performance and Quality of Life (IPQ) Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 May;45(3):402-409. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1803658. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1080/10790268.2020.1803658
PMID:32808892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9135426/
Abstract

Various clinical application of the five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST), with or without hands, may confound the outcomes to determine the lower limb functions and mobility of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). This study assessed the concurrent validity of the FTSST in ambulatory individuals with SCI who completed the test with or without hands as verified using standard measures for lower extremity motor scores (LEMS) and functional mobility necessary for independence and safety of these individuals. Cross-sectional study. Tertiary rehabilitation centers and community hospitals. Fifty-six ambulatory individuals with motor incomplete SCI who were able to walk independently with or without a walking device over at least 10 m. Time to complete the FTSST with or without hands according to individuals' abilities, LEMS, and functional mobility. Time to complete the FTSST showed moderate-to-strong correlation with the LEMS scores and all functional mobility tests ( = -0.38 to -0.71, P < 0.05), but only in those who performed the test without hands. By contrast, data of those who completed the FTSST with hands were significantly correlated only with the ankle muscle strength and the functional mobility measures that allow upper limb contribution in the tests ( = -0.40 to 0.52, P < 0.05). Upper limb involvement could confound the outcomes of the FTSST. The present findings suggest the use of FTSST without hands to determine the lower limb functions of ambulatory individuals with SCI.

摘要

五次坐站测试(FTSST)的各种临床应用,无论是否使用手,都可能混淆结果,从而无法确定脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的下肢功能和移动能力。本研究评估了 FTSST 在能够使用或不使用助行器独立行走至少 10 米的运动不完全性 SCI 患者中的同时效度,这些患者使用下肢运动评分(LEMS)和功能移动性的标准测量方法进行验证,这些标准对于这些患者的独立性和安全性是必要的。横断面研究。三级康复中心和社区医院。56 名能够独立使用或不使用行走装置行走至少 10 米的运动不完全性 SCI 患者。根据个人能力、LEMS 和功能移动性完成 FTSST 的时间。完成 FTSST 的时间与 LEMS 评分和所有功能移动性测试呈中等到强相关( = -0.38 至-0.71,P < 0.05),但仅在那些不使用手完成测试的患者中如此。相比之下,那些使用手完成 FTSST 的患者的数据仅与踝关节肌肉力量和允许上肢在测试中贡献的功能移动性测量值显著相关( = -0.40 至 0.52,P < 0.05)。上肢参与可能会混淆 FTSST 的结果。本研究结果表明,在确定运动不完全性 SCI 患者的下肢功能时,应使用不使用手的 FTSST。