Pellot Joel E., De Jesus Orlando
University of Puerto Rico
University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, Neurosurgery Section
Suboccipital puncture is a procedure that was developed at the beginning of the last century. It was designed to obtain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes as an alternative to lumbar puncture. It was performed through a midline puncture below the occipital bone. Many years later, the puncture was modified, and it was performed as a lateral C1-C2 cervical puncture. Recently, suboccipital puncture has been popularized using a lateral trajectory. In 1908, Obregia performed the first in vivo midline suboccipital puncture. His idea was used in 1919 by Ionescu to administer general anesthesia. Wegeforth, Ayer, and Essick also used it during 1919-1920, which they called a cisterna magna puncture. In its early years, the suboccipital puncture had numerous indications, but most are now outdated. Nevertheless, it can be used when a lumbar puncture cannot be performed or is contraindicated. It is still currently used for animal experiments to obtain CSF or to inject drugs. A lateral C1-C2 cervical puncture technique for percutaneous cervical cordotomy was developed by Mullan et al. in 1962 and by Rosomof et al. in 1965. The technique was later used in 1975 by Skalpe and Amundsen for myelography and in 1979 by Rice and Bathia. With its safer CSF collection and the ability to perform cervical myelography, it has largely supplanted suboccipital puncture. Cervical myelography led to the widespread use of the lateral cervical puncture in appropriate cases. Several years later, a controversy arose, arguing that a cervical injection was unnecessary for cervical myelography, noting that if sufficient contrast were injected into the lumbar spine via lumbar puncture, adequate visualization of the entire spine would be achieved, making lateral cervical or suboccipital puncture unnecessary. Therefore, the procedure was also abandoned and was used only in cases where lumbar access was unavailable or contraindicated. Although lateral C1–C2 puncture was previously preferred for cervical myelography, most radiologists now prefer a lumbar puncture approach. In 2009, a survey showed that over 85% of neuroradiologists still performed C1-C2 lateral punctures and that over 95% still consider it to be the standard of care for cervical myelography. In 2017, Gong et al described a lateral atlantooccipital space puncture (also called lateral cisterna magna puncture), in which they performed 1008 procedures in 667 patients. This procedure is similar to the original midline suboccipital puncture but is performed via a lateral approach. The method avoids midline suboccipital puncture and the risks associated with medulla oblongata puncture. This technique will probably revive the use of the suboccipital puncture. Both techniques are described in this review: the suboccipital puncture and the cervical C1-C2 puncture. Both should be well known, and on some occasions, one procedure can be used as an alternative to the other.
枕下穿刺是上世纪初开发的一种操作方法。它旨在获取脑脊液(CSF)用于诊断和治疗目的,作为腰椎穿刺的替代方法。它是通过枕骨下方的中线穿刺进行的。多年后,穿刺方法得到改进,改为C1 - C2颈椎侧方穿刺。最近,枕下穿刺再次流行,但采用的是侧方进针路径。1908年,奥布雷贾进行了首例体内枕下中线穿刺。1919年,约内斯库利用了他的想法来注射全身麻醉剂。1919年至1920年期间,韦格福思、艾耶尔和埃西克也使用了这种方法,他们称之为枕大池穿刺。关于其起源,枕下穿刺有许多适应证,但大多数现已过时。不过,当无法进行或禁忌进行腰椎穿刺时,仍可使用。目前它仍用于动物实验以获取脑脊液或注射药物。1962年,穆兰等人以及1965年罗索莫夫等人开发了C1 - C2颈椎侧方穿刺技术用于经皮脊髓切断术。1975年,斯卡佩和阿蒙森将该技术用于脊髓造影,1979年,赖斯和巴蒂亚也使用了该技术。由于其获取脑脊液更安全且能够进行颈椎脊髓造影,它几乎取代了枕下穿刺的使用。颈椎脊髓造影导致侧方颈椎穿刺在适当情况下得到广泛应用。几年后,引发了一场争议,有人认为进行颈椎脊髓造影不需要颈椎注射,因为认识到如果通过腰椎穿刺在腰椎注入足够的造影剂,整个脊柱将有足够的显影,从而无需进行侧方颈椎穿刺或枕下穿刺。因此,该操作方法也被遗忘,仅用于无法进行腰椎穿刺或存在禁忌证的情况。尽管以前颈椎脊髓造影首选C1 - C2侧方穿刺,但现在大多数放射科医生更喜欢腰椎穿刺方法。2009年的一项调查显示,超过85%的神经放射科医生仍在进行C1 - C2侧方穿刺,超过95%的人仍认为这是颈椎脊髓造影的标准操作。2017年,龚等人描述了一种寰枕外侧间隙穿刺(也称为外侧枕大池穿刺),他在667例患者中进行了10次该操作。此操作与最初的枕下中线穿刺类似,但采用侧方进针路径。该方法避免了枕下中线穿刺和延髓穿刺的风险。这种技术可能会使枕下穿刺的使用再次兴起。本综述描述了这两种技术;枕下穿刺和颈椎C1 - C2穿刺。两者都应广为人知,并且在某些情况下,一种操作方法可以作为另一种的替代方法。