Department of Sports Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, School of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey;Clinic of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Isparta City Hospital, Isparta, Turkey.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, SANKO University, School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Jul;54(4):430-437. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.17481.
This study aimed to determine, pre-correction, the potential change in the osteotomy-site bony contact surface area that would occur during standard metatarsal diaphyseal procedures with the Baran-Unal modification of Mau osteotomy and then to compare it, post-correction, with the actual osteotomy-site bony contact surface area changes for a standard degree of deformity correction.
A total of 30 standard, same sized, biomechanically equivalent, left first metatarsal sawbones were included in this experimental study. They were divided equally into five groups for each of the planned osteotomy techniques: Myerson's modification of Ludloff, Mau, scarf, Offset V, and Baran-Unal modification of Mau osteotomy. The normal osteotomy for each sample was considered as the control, while the corrective osteotomy was the test. Computerized tomography scans and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction imaging were performed for objective and accurate measurements. The techniques of the osteotomy and post-corrective osteotomy bony contact surface areas were investigated by the two independent research assistants.
There was a statistically significant difference between the contact surface area changes of all pre- and post-corrective osteotomy groups (P<0.05). When the pre- and post-correction contact surface areas of any one group were compared with the other groups, the differences were or were not statistically significant. Mean differences between pre-correction and post-correction areas for Ludloff, Mau, scarf, Offset V, and Baran-Unal osteotomies were 180.7, 122.3, 226.2, 191.9, and 68.9 mm2, and the percentages of area loss were 22.9%, 15.5%, 28.6%, 24.3%, and 8.7%, respectively. The most bony contact area was found in the scarf osteotomy group (mean pre-correction area: 490.5 mm2 and mean post-correction area: 264.3 mm2), but the Baran-Unal modification group has significantly the highest post-correction bony contact area among the all other groups (mean pre-correction area: 413.3 mm2 and mean post-correction area: 344.4 mm2).
Metatarsal diaphyseal osteotomies for hallux valgus deformity have the potential not only for deformity correction, but also for contact surface area preservation. This study reaffirms the considerable potential of this new Baran-Unal modification to confer outstanding contact surface area values, even with the operative correction of hallux valgus deformity.
本研究旨在确定标准跖骨干术式中,Mau 截骨术的 Baran-Unal 改良术式在预校正时可能发生的截骨部位骨接触面积变化,然后将其与标准程度的畸形校正后的实际截骨部位骨接触面积变化进行比较。
本实验研究共纳入 30 个相同大小、生物力学等效的左侧第一跖骨锯骨。它们被平均分为五组,用于每种计划的截骨技术:Myerson 改良 Ludloff 截骨术、Mau 截骨术、Scarf 截骨术、Offset V 截骨术和 Baran-Unal 改良 Mau 截骨术。每个样本的正常截骨被视为对照,而矫正截骨则为试验。通过计算机断层扫描和三维(3D)重建成像进行客观和准确的测量。两名独立的研究助理研究了截骨术和矫正后截骨术的骨接触面积技术。
所有预校正和校正后截骨组的接触面积变化均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。当比较任何一组的预校正和校正后接触面积时,差异有统计学意义或无统计学意义。Ludloff、Mau、Scarf、Offset V 和 Baran-Unal 截骨术的预校正和校正后面积之间的平均差异分别为 180.7、122.3、226.2、191.9 和 68.9mm²,面积损失百分比分别为 22.9%、15.5%、28.6%、24.3%和 8.7%。骨接触面积最大的是 Scarf 截骨组(平均预校正面积:490.5mm²,平均校正后面积:264.3mm²),但 Baran-Unal 改良组在所有其他组中具有最高的校正后骨接触面积(平均预校正面积:413.3mm²,平均校正后面积:344.4mm²)。
跖骨干术式治疗踇外翻畸形不仅具有畸形矫正的潜力,而且具有保持接触面积的潜力。本研究再次证实了这种新的 Baran-Unal 改良术具有很大的潜力,可以提供出色的接触面积值,即使对踇外翻畸形进行手术矫正也是如此。