Goddard Frederick G B, Ban Radu, Barr Dana Boyd, Brown Joe, Cannon Jennifer, Colford John M, Eisenberg Joseph N S, Ercumen Ayse, Petach Helen, Freeman Matthew C, Levy Karen, Luby Stephen P, Moe Christine, Pickering Amy J, Sarnat Jeremy A, Stewart Jill, Thomas Evan, Taniuchi Mami, Clasen Thomas
Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Oct 6;54(19):11673-11691. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02421. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
Infections with enteric pathogens impose a heavy disease burden, especially among young children in low-income countries. Recent findings from randomized controlled trials of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have raised questions about current methods for assessing environmental exposure to enteric pathogens. Approaches for estimating sources and doses of exposure suffer from a number of shortcomings, including reliance on imperfect indicators of fecal contamination instead of actual pathogens and estimating exposure indirectly from imprecise measurements of pathogens in the environment and human interaction therewith. These shortcomings limit the potential for effective surveillance of exposures, identification of important sources and modes of transmission, and evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions. In this review, we summarize current and emerging approaches used to characterize enteric pathogen hazards in different environmental media as well as human interaction with those media (external measures of exposure), and review methods that measure human infection with enteric pathogens as a proxy for past exposure (internal measures of exposure). We draw from lessons learned in other areas of environmental health to highlight how external and internal measures of exposure can be used to more comprehensively assess exposure. We conclude by recommending strategies for advancing enteric pathogen exposure assessments.
肠道病原体感染造成了沉重的疾病负担,在低收入国家的幼儿中尤为如此。近期关于水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施的随机对照试验结果,引发了人们对当前评估肠道病原体环境暴露方法的质疑。估计暴露源和暴露剂量的方法存在一些缺陷,包括依赖粪便污染的不完美指标而非实际病原体,以及通过对环境中病原体的不精确测量及其与人类的相互作用间接估计暴露。这些缺陷限制了有效监测暴露、识别重要传播源和传播途径以及评估干预措施有效性的可能性。在本综述中,我们总结了用于描述不同环境介质中肠道病原体危害以及人类与这些介质相互作用(暴露的外部测量)的现有方法和新出现的方法,并回顾了将人类肠道病原体感染作为过去暴露替代指标的测量方法(暴露的内部测量)。我们借鉴环境卫生其他领域的经验教训,以强调如何利用暴露的外部和内部测量更全面地评估暴露情况。我们最后提出推进肠道病原体暴露评估的策略建议。