Wiesel Ido, Shahar Ben, Goldman Rhonda N, Bar-Kalifa Eran
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Fam Process. 2021 Jun;60(2):377-392. doi: 10.1111/famp.12587. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
The primary mechanism of change in emotion-focused couples therapy (EFT-C) is described as one partner accessing and expressing vulnerability, with the other partner responding affiliatively, with compassion, acceptance, validation, and support. These interactions are assumed to restructure the negative, rigid interactional cycle that usually brings couples to therapy and helps build a positive emotional bond. The primary aim of this study was to test whether for this process to occur, partners need to accurately perceive their spouse's experiences of vulnerability during therapy. Specifically, it examined the factors (i.e., tracking accuracy, assumed-similarity bias, and directional bias) shaping partners' perceptions of their spouse's vulnerability and whether accurate perceptions predict positive session outcomes during EFT-C. Data from 36 couples who took part in the York Emotional Injury Project were analyzed. Following each session, clients reported their own experience of vulnerability as well as their perceptions of their partners' vulnerability. Session outcome was defined as the extent to which clients reported resolution. Using a multilevel Truth and Bias model, the results indicated that partners accurately perceived changes in their spouses' expressions of vulnerability (i.e., significant tracking accuracy). Interestingly, partners' perceptions were also tied to their own expressions of vulnerability (i.e., significant assumed-similarity bias) and tended to underestimate the level of their partners' vulnerability expressions (i.e., significant negative mean-level bias). Using a multilevel Response Surface Analysis, we found that accuracy regarding partners' vulnerability was associated with higher levels of resolution.
情绪聚焦夫妻治疗(EFT-C)的主要改变机制被描述为一方能够触及并表达自身的脆弱,另一方则以共情、接纳、认可和支持的方式给予亲和回应。这些互动被认为能够重构通常导致夫妻前来治疗的消极、僵化的互动循环,并有助于建立积极的情感纽带。本研究的主要目的是检验在这一过程中,伴侣双方是否需要在治疗期间准确感知配偶的脆弱体验。具体而言,研究考察了影响伴侣对配偶脆弱性认知的因素(即追踪准确性、假设相似性偏差和方向性偏差),以及准确的认知是否能够预测EFT-C治疗期间的积极疗程结果。对参与约克情感伤害项目的36对夫妻的数据进行了分析。在每个疗程结束后,客户报告了自己的脆弱体验以及对伴侣脆弱性的认知。疗程结果被定义为客户报告的问题解决程度。使用多层次的真实与偏差模型,结果表明伴侣能够准确感知配偶脆弱性表达的变化(即显著的追踪准确性)。有趣的是,伴侣的认知也与他们自己的脆弱性表达相关(即显著的假设相似性偏差),并且往往低估伴侣脆弱性表达的程度(即显著的负平均水平偏差)。使用多层次响应面分析,我们发现伴侣对彼此脆弱性的认知准确性与更高的问题解决水平相关。