• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尿道填充剂:原发性与挽救性手术结果的回顾性研究。

Urethral bulking agents: a retrospective review of primary versus salvage procedure outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Urogynaecology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):2107-2112. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03413-7. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-020-03413-7
PMID:32816136
Abstract

PURPOSE

Urethral bulking agents (UBA) have traditionally been offered as salvage procedures for recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We compare the success of UBA in patients that had undergone a previous procedure for SUI (Salvage-UBA) to the SUI surgery naïve (Primary-UBA). We hypothesised a positive effect in both Primary and Salvage-UBA with potentially poorer rates of response in the salvage group.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of patients having their first UBA (2010-2018). Primary outcome was to assess any difference in patient reported success between groups. Patient-reported improvement was assessed on a 4-point scale: 'cured, improved, no change, worse' and treatment 'success' defined as 'cured' or 'improved'. A multivariate analysis, adjusting for plausible differences between groups, was undertaken in IBM SPSS Statistics (2016).

RESULTS

135 Primary-UBA and 38 Salvage-UBA were performed. Complete follow-up was obtained for 114 patients (66%): 86 Primary and 28 Salvage. Median follow-up time: 33 months. In 2012, 47% (8/17) of all UBA were Salvage-UBA, whilst in 2018, the majority were Primary-UBA (92%, 46/50). Success was not significantly different between Salvage-UBA 75% (21/28) versus Primary-UBA 67% (58/86) (Wald χ = 0.687, df = 1, p = 0.407). Top-up rates were similar: 14% (n = 4/28, Salvage-UBA) versus 15% (n = 13/86, Primary-UBA) (χ = 0.011, df = 1, p = 0.914).

CONCLUSION

The number of women opting for UBA has increased substantially. No significant differences were noted for success with Salvage-UBA compared to Primary-UBA.

摘要

目的

尿道填充剂(UBA)传统上被作为复发性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的补救治疗方法。我们比较了先前接受过 SUI 手术(补救性 UBA)和初次接受 SUI 手术(原发性 UBA)的患者中 UBA 的成功率。我们假设原发性和补救性 UBA 都会有积极的效果,但在补救组中,反应的可能性较差。

方法

对 2010 年至 2018 年间首次接受 UBA 的患者进行回顾性病例系列研究。主要结局是评估两组患者报告的成功率有无差异。患者报告的改善情况采用 4 分制进行评估:“治愈、改善、无变化、恶化”,治疗“成功”定义为“治愈”或“改善”。在 IBM SPSS Statistics(2016)中进行了调整组间可能差异的多变量分析。

结果

共进行了 135 例原发性 UBA 和 38 例补救性 UBA。114 例患者(66%)获得了完整的随访:86 例原发性和 28 例补救性。中位随访时间:33 个月。2012 年,所有 UBA 的 47%(8/17)为补救性 UBA,而 2018 年,大多数为原发性 UBA(92%,46/50)。补救性 UBA 的成功率为 75%(28/28),原发性 UBA 的成功率为 67%(58/86),两组间无显著差异(Wald χ=0.687,df=1,p=0.407)。追加治疗率相似:14%(n=4/28,补救性 UBA)与 15%(n=13/86,原发性 UBA)(χ=0.011,df=1,p=0.914)。

结论

选择 UBA 的女性人数大幅增加。与原发性 UBA 相比,补救性 UBA 的成功率无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Urethral bulking agents: a retrospective review of primary versus salvage procedure outcomes.尿道填充剂:原发性与挽救性手术结果的回顾性研究。
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):2107-2112. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03413-7. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
2
Effectiveness and Safety Profile of Urethral Bulking with Bulkamid for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A French Multi-Center Cohort Study.使用Bulkamid进行尿道填充治疗压力性尿失禁的有效性和安全性:一项法国多中心队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan;36(1):205-211. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-06005-w. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
3
Urethral bulking with Bulkamid: An analysis of efficacy, safety profile, and predictors of functional outcomes in a single-center cohort.尿道填充剂巴利米德的疗效分析:单中心队列研究中功能结局的安全性特征及预测因素分析。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Jun;39(5):1523-1528. doi: 10.1002/nau.24388. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
Intraurethral bulking agents for the management of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review.用于治疗女性压力性尿失禁的尿道内填充剂:一项系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Sep;28(9):1275-1284. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3278-7. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Urethral bulking agents for female stress urinary incontinence.尿道填充剂治疗女性压力性尿失禁。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Mar;38(3):887-892. doi: 10.1002/nau.23924. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
6
How cure rates drive patients' preference for urethral bulking agent or mid-urethral sling surgery as therapy for stress urinary incontinence.治愈率如何影响患者对尿道填充剂或中尿道吊带手术治疗压力性尿失禁的治疗偏好。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Jun;38(5):1384-1391. doi: 10.1002/nau.23997. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
Can Urethral Bulking Agents Salvage Failed Slings?尿道填充剂能挽救失败的吊带手术吗?
Urology. 2019 Feb;124:78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
8
Seven-year efficacy and safety outcomes of Bulkamid for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.布利卡米德治疗压力性尿失禁的 7 年疗效和安全性结果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Jan;40(1):502-508. doi: 10.1002/nau.24589. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
9
Transurethral injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid(®)) for the treatment of female stress or mixed urinary incontinence.经尿道注射聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶(Bulkamid®)治疗女性压力性或混合性尿失禁。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Jul;178:199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.033. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
10
[Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after anti-incontinence surgery].[抗尿失禁手术后复发性压力性尿失禁的管理]
Ceska Gynekol. 2017 Winter;82(1):59-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Can urethral re-bulking improve the outcomes of a prior urethral bulking?尿道再次填充能否改善既往尿道填充的效果?
Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Jan 18;14:17562872211069265. doi: 10.1177/17562872211069265. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Particulate Versus Non-Particulate Bulking Agents In The Treatment Of Stress Urinary Incontinence.颗粒状与非颗粒状填充剂治疗压力性尿失禁的比较
Res Rep Urol. 2019 Nov 12;11:299-310. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S220216. eCollection 2019.
2
Tension-Free Vaginal Tape Surgery versus Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Injection for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经阴道无张力吊带术与聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶注射治疗原发性压力性尿失禁的随机临床试验。
J Urol. 2020 Feb;203(2):372-378. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000517. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
3
NICE Guidance - Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: © NICE (2019) Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management.
英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南 - 女性尿失禁和盆腔器官脱垂:管理:©英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(2019年)女性尿失禁和盆腔器官脱垂:管理。
BJU Int. 2019 May;123(5):777-803. doi: 10.1111/bju.14763.
4
Urethral bulking agents for female stress urinary incontinence.尿道填充剂治疗女性压力性尿失禁。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Mar;38(3):887-892. doi: 10.1002/nau.23924. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
5
Changing surgical trends for female stress urinary incontinence in England.英国女性压力性尿失禁手术趋势的变化
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Feb;30(2):203-209. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3839-4. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
Injection of Urethral Bulking Agents.尿道填充剂注射
Urol Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;46(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.012.
7
Urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的尿道注射疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 25;7(7):CD003881. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003881.pub4.
8
Durability, safety and efficacy of polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid(®)) in the management of stress and mixed urinary incontinence: three year follow up outcomes.聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶(Bulkamid(®))治疗压力性和混合性尿失禁的耐久性、安全性及疗效:三年随访结果
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(4):428-33. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.647. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
9
Polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid®) for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review of the literature.用于女性压力性尿失禁的聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶(Bulkamid®):文献系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Mar;27(3):367-75. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2781-y. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
10
Efficacy and safety of polyacrylamide hydrogel for the treatment of female stress incontinence: a randomized, prospective, multicenter North American study.聚丙稀酰胺水凝胶治疗女性压力性尿失禁的有效性和安全性:一项随机、前瞻性、多中心北美研究。
J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.109. Epub 2014 Apr 2.