Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK.
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;30(6):1176-1180. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa168.
Reports from the UK and the USA suggest that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) predominantly affects poorer neighbourhoods. This article paints a more complex picture by distinguishing between a first and second phase of the pandemic. The initial spread of infections and its correlation with socio-economic factors depends on how the virus first entered a country. The second phase of the pandemic begins when individuals start taking precautionary measures and governments implement lockdowns. In this phase, the spread of the virus depends on the ability of individuals to socially distance themselves, which is to some extent socially stratified.
We analyze the geographical distribution of known cumulative cases and fatalities per capita in an ecological analysis across local districts in Germany distinguishing between the first and the second phase of the pandemic.
In Germany, the virus first entered via individuals returning from skiing in the Alps and other international travel. In this first phase, we find a positive association between the wealth of a district and infection rates and a negative association with indicators of social deprivation. During the second phase and controlling for path dependency, districts with a higher share of university-educated employees record fewer new infections and deaths and richer districts record fewer deaths, districts with a higher unemployment rate record more deaths.
The social stratification of COVID-19 changes substantively across the two phases of the pandemic in Germany. Only in the second phase and controlling for temporal dependence does COVID-19 predominantly hit poorer districts.
英国和美国的报告表明,2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)主要影响贫困社区。本文通过区分大流行的第一阶段和第二阶段,描绘了一个更为复杂的图景。感染的初始传播及其与社会经济因素的相关性取决于病毒首次进入一个国家的方式。大流行的第二阶段始于个人开始采取预防措施和政府实施封锁之时。在这一阶段,病毒的传播取决于个人社交隔离的能力,而这种能力在一定程度上是社会分层的。
我们在德国地方行政区的生态分析中,根据第一阶段和第二阶段区分了已知累计病例和人均死亡的地理分布。
在德国,病毒首先通过从阿尔卑斯山滑雪和其他国际旅行返回的个人传入。在第一阶段,我们发现一个地区的财富与感染率之间存在正相关,与社会贫困指标之间存在负相关。在第二阶段并控制路径依赖后,受过高等教育的员工比例较高的地区新感染和死亡人数较少,富裕地区死亡人数较少,失业率较高的地区死亡人数较多。
在德国,COVID-19 在大流行的两个阶段之间发生了实质性的社会分层变化。只有在第二阶段并控制时间依赖关系时,COVID-19 才主要影响贫困地区。