• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂冠状动脉血运重建后十年全因死亡率的性别差异。

Sex Differences in All-Cause Mortality in the Decade Following Complex Coronary Revascularization.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 25;76(8):889-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.066.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.066
PMID:32819461
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The poorer prognosis of coronary artery disease in females compared with males is related mainly to differences in baseline characteristics. In the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trial, the effect of treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) on mortality at 5 years differed significantly between females and males; however, the optimal revascularization beyond 5 years according to sex has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of sex on mortality and sex-treatment interaction at 10 years.

METHODS

The SYNTAXES (SYNTAX Extended Survival) study evaluated vital status up to 10 years in 1,800 patients with de novo 3-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease randomized to treatment with PCI or CABG in the SYNTAX trial. All-cause death at 10 years was separately evaluated in female and male patients with complex coronary artery disease.

RESULTS

Of 1,800 patients, 402 (22.3%) were female and 1,398 (77.7%) were males. Females had a higher 10-year mortality rate compared with males (32.8% vs. 24.7%; log-rank p = 0.002), but female sex was not an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval: 0.76 to 1.36). Mortality at 10 years tended to be lower after CABG than after PCI, with a similar treatment effect for female and male patients (adjusted hazard ratio for females: 0.90 [95% confidence interval: 0.54 to 1.51]; adjusted hazard ratio for males: 0.76 [95% confidence interval: 0.56 to 1.02]; p for interaction = 0.952).

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex was not an independent predictor of mortality at 10 years in patients with complex coronary artery disease. The interaction between sex and treatment with PCI or CABG that was observed at 5 years was no longer present at 10 years. (Synergy Between PCI With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: SYNTAX Extended Survival [SYNTAXES], NCT03417050; SYNTAX Study: TAXUS Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Narrowed Arteries [SYNTAX], NCT00114972).

摘要

背景

与男性相比,女性冠心病的预后较差,主要与基线特征的差异有关。在 SYNTAX(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与紫杉醇协同作用及心脏手术)试验中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗对 5 年死亡率的影响在女性和男性之间有显著差异;然而,根据性别评估超过 5 年的最佳血运重建效果尚未得到评估。

目的

本研究旨在探讨性别对 10 年死亡率和性别治疗相互作用的影响。

方法

SYNTAXES(SYNTAX 扩展生存)研究评估了 1800 例新发 3 支血管和/或左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的生存状态,这些患者在 SYNTAX 试验中随机接受 PCI 或 CABG 治疗,直至 10 年。对复杂冠状动脉疾病的女性和男性患者分别评估全因死亡率。

结果

在 1800 例患者中,402 例(22.3%)为女性,1398 例(77.7%)为男性。与男性相比,女性 10 年死亡率更高(32.8%比 24.7%;对数秩检验 p=0.002),但女性性别不是死亡率的独立预测因素(调整后的危险比:1.02;95%置信区间:0.76 至 1.36)。CABG 后的死亡率较 PCI 后有下降趋势,且女性和男性患者的治疗效果相似(女性调整后的危险比:0.90[95%置信区间:0.54 至 1.51];男性调整后的危险比:0.76[95%置信区间:0.56 至 1.02];p 交互=0.952)。

结论

在复杂冠状动脉疾病患者中,女性性别不是 10 年死亡率的独立预测因素。在 5 年时观察到的 PCI 或 CABG 治疗与性别之间的交互作用在 10 年时不再存在。(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与紫杉醇协同作用及心脏手术:SYNTAX 扩展生存[SYNTAXES],NCT03417050;SYNTAX 研究:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗狭窄血管[SYNTAX],NCT00114972)。

相似文献

1
Sex Differences in All-Cause Mortality in the Decade Following Complex Coronary Revascularization.复杂冠状动脉血运重建后十年全因死亡率的性别差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 25;76(8):889-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.066.
2
10-Year All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Heavy Calcification.重度钙化患者行经皮或手术血运重建后 10 年全因死亡率。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 24;15(2):193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
3
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
4
Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on 10-Year Mortality After Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建后最佳药物治疗对 10 年死亡率的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jul 6;78(1):27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.087.
5
Mortality 10 Years After Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Total Coronary Artery Occlusions.完全性冠状动脉闭塞患者经皮或手术血运重建 10 年后的死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 9;77(5):529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.055.
6
Impact of Peri-Procedural Myocardial Infarction on Outcomes After Revascularization.围术期心肌梗死对血运重建后结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Oct 6;76(14):1622-1639. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.009.
7
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三血管病变或左主干病变患者:多中心随机对照 SYNTAX 试验 10 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
8
Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial.在紫杉醇药物涂层支架与心脏搭桥术联合治疗左主干病变研究中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变患者的 5 年结果。
Circulation. 2014 Jun 10;129(23):2388-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006689. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
9
10-Year Follow-Up After Revascularization in Elderly Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease.老年复杂冠状动脉疾病患者血运重建后的 10 年随访。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 8;77(22):2761-2773. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.016.
10
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Femoral Artery Access Characteristics and Female Sex in In-Hospital Complications for Patients Undergoing Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions.股动脉入路特征及女性性别在慢性完全闭塞病变再通患者院内并发症中的作用
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 25;14(13):4496. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134496.
2
The association between lower prognostic nutritional index and higher short- & long-term mortality in older adults (≥ 70 years) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective study.老年(≥70岁)冠状动脉搭桥术患者中较低的预后营养指数与较高的短期和长期死亡率之间的关联:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 14;25(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05833-9.
3
Sex and age-specific 10-year mortality after coronary stenting: an analysis of two randomized trials.
冠状动脉支架置入术后特定性别和年龄的10年死亡率:两项随机试验的分析
Eur Heart J Open. 2025 Jan 29;5(1):oeaf006. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf006. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Time Trends in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis on Sex Differences.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要不良心血管事件的时间趋势:性别差异的荟萃分析
JACC Adv. 2025 Jan 8;4(2):101526. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101526. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Sex-Based Differences and Outcomes in Unselected Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography.接受冠状动脉造影的未筛选患者中的性别差异与预后
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 2;14(1):224. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010224.
6
Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in women, a meta-analysis.女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期预后:一项荟萃分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Dec 20;19(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03167-y.
7
Sex Differences in Procedural Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Bifurcation PCI.分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的手术特征和临床结局的性别差异
Korean Circ J. 2025 Jan;55(1):5-16. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0172. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
8
Outcomes of Complex Percutaneous Cardiac Interventions in Women.女性复杂经皮心脏介入治疗的结果
US Cardiol. 2023 Nov 23;17:e18. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.21. eCollection 2023.
9
Are We Unisex When Undergoing Left Main Revascularization?我们在进行左主干血运重建时是否存在性别差异?
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 May 30;1(4):100345. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100345. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
10
Sex-based Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease.缺血性心脏病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的性别差异
Eur Cardiol. 2023 Mar 2;18:e06. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.24. eCollection 2023.