Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Emergency Care Research Core, St. Louis, Missouri.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):339-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.06.068. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
Adult septic arthritis can be challenging to differentiate from other causes of acute joint pain. The diagnostic accuracy of synovial lactate and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) remains uncertain.
Our aim was to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of synovial lactate, PCR, and clinical evaluation for adults with possible septic arthritis in the emergency department (ED).
We report a prospective sampling of ED patients aged ≥ 18 years with knee symptoms concerning for septic arthritis. Clinicians and research assistants independently performed history and physical examination. Serum and synovial laboratory testing was ordered at the discretion of the clinician. We analyzed frozen synovial fluid specimens for l- and d-lactate and PCR. The criterion standard for septic arthritis was bacterial growth on synovial culture and treated by consultants with operative drainage, prolonged antibiotics, or both. Diagnostic accuracy measures included sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, interval likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve.
Seventy-one patients were included with septic arthritis prevalence of 7%. No finding on history or physical examination accurately ruled in or ruled out septic arthritis. Synovial l- and d-lactate and PCR were inaccurate for the diagnosis of septic arthritis. Synovial white blood cell count and synovial Gram stain most accurately rule in and rule out septic arthritis.
Septic arthritis prevalence in ED adults is lower than reported previously. History and physical examination, synovial lactate, and PCR are inadequate for the diagnosis of septic arthritis. Synovial white blood cell count and Gram stain are the most accurate tests available for septic arthritis.
成人脓毒性关节炎很难与其他急性关节痛的病因区分开来。滑液乳酸和聚合酶链反应(PCR)的诊断准确性仍不确定。
我们旨在定量评估滑液乳酸、PCR 和临床评估对急诊科(ED)疑似脓毒性关节炎成人的诊断准确性。
我们报告了一项对 18 岁以上膝关节症状疑似脓毒性关节炎的 ED 患者的前瞻性采样。临床医生和研究助理独立进行了病史和体格检查。根据临床医生的判断,对血清和滑膜实验室检测进行了检测。我们对冷冻的滑膜液标本进行 l-和 d-乳酸和 PCR 分析。脓毒性关节炎的标准诊断是滑膜培养物中有细菌生长,并由顾问进行手术引流、延长抗生素治疗或两者兼施。诊断准确性指标包括敏感性、特异性、似然比、间隔似然比和受试者工作特征曲线下面积。
共纳入 71 例患者,脓毒性关节炎的患病率为 7%。病史或体格检查均无发现可准确排除或确诊脓毒性关节炎。滑液 l-和 d-乳酸和 PCR 对脓毒性关节炎的诊断不准确。滑膜白细胞计数和滑膜革兰氏染色最能准确地诊断和排除脓毒性关节炎。
ED 成人脓毒性关节炎的患病率低于先前报道。病史和体格检查、滑液乳酸和 PCR 不足以诊断脓毒性关节炎。滑膜白细胞计数和革兰氏染色是脓毒性关节炎最准确的检测方法。