Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):343-354. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.014.
Guidelines recommend individualized breast cancer screening and prevention interventions for women in their 40s. Yet, few primary care clinicians assess breast cancer risk.
Pretest-Posttest trial.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 40-49 years were recruited from one large Boston-based academic primary care practice between July 2017 and April 2019.
Participants completed a pretest, received a personalized breast cancer risk report, saw their primary care clinician, and completed a posttest.
Using mixed effects models, changes in screening intentions (0-100 scale [0=will not screen to 100=will screen]), mammography knowledge, decisional conflict, and receipt of screening were examined. Analyses were conducted from June 2019 to February 2020.
Patient (n=337) mean age was 44.1 (SD=2.9) years, 61.4% were non-Hispanic white, and 76.6% were college graduates; 306 (90.5%) completed follow-up (203 with 5-year breast cancer risk <1.1%). Screening intentions declined from pre- to post-visit (79.3 to 68.0, p<0.0001), especially for women with 5-year risk <1.1% (77.2 to 63.3, p<0.0001), but still favored screening. In the 2 years prior, 37.6% had screening mammography compared with 41.8% over a mean 16 months follow-up (p=0.17). Mammography knowledge increased and decisional conflict declined. Eleven (3.3%) women met criteria for breast cancer prevention medications (ten discussed medications with their clinicians), 22 (6.5%) for MRI (19 discussed MRI with their clinician), and 67 (19.8%) for genetic counseling (47 discussed with the clinician).
Receipt of a personalized breast cancer report was associated with women in their 40s making more-informed and less-conflicted mammography screening decisions and with high-risk women discussing breast cancer prevention interventions with clinicians.
This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.govNCT03180086.
指南建议为 40 多岁的女性提供个性化的乳腺癌筛查和预防干预措施。然而,很少有初级保健临床医生评估乳腺癌风险。
预-后测试试验。
设置/参与者:2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 4 月期间,从一家位于波士顿的大型学术初级保健实践中招募了 40-49 岁的女性。
参与者完成了预测试,收到了个性化的乳腺癌风险报告,看了他们的初级保健医生,并完成了后测试。
使用混合效应模型,检查了筛查意图(0-100 分制[0=不筛查至 100=筛查])、乳房 X 线照相术知识、决策冲突和筛查的变化。分析于 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 2 月进行。
患者(n=337)的平均年龄为 44.1(SD=2.9)岁,61.4%为非西班牙裔白人,76.6%为大学毕业生;306(90.5%)完成了随访(203 人有 5 年乳腺癌风险<1.1%)。筛查意图从预测试到后测试下降(79.3 至 68.0,p<0.0001),尤其是 5 年风险<1.1%的女性(77.2 至 63.3,p<0.0001),但仍倾向于筛查。在过去的 2 年中,有 37.6%的人进行了筛查性乳房 X 线照相术,而在平均 16 个月的随访期间,有 41.8%的人进行了乳房 X 线照相术(p=0.17)。乳房 X 线照相术知识增加,决策冲突减少。11 名(3.3%)妇女符合乳腺癌预防药物标准(10 名与临床医生讨论了药物),22 名(6.5%)符合 MRI 标准(19 名与临床医生讨论了 MRI),67 名(19.8%)符合基因咨询标准(47 名与临床医生讨论)。
接受个性化乳腺癌报告与 40 多岁的女性做出更明智、冲突更少的乳房 X 线照相术筛查决策有关,并且高危女性与临床医生讨论了乳腺癌预防干预措施。
本研究在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,NCT03180086。