Faculty of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Interdisciplinary Research Department, University Center ICESP, Brasília, Brazil.
Ther Apher Dial. 2021 Jun;25(3):282-289. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.13581. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Hemodialysis (HD) patients experience hemodynamic instability and intradialytic exercise seems to attenuate it. This study aimed to verify the acute hemodynamic response to different intradialytic handgrip exercise intensities in HD patients. In a randomized, cross-over, experimental pilot study, eight patients completed two experimental sessions and one control in random order: (a) regular HD; (b) low-intensity isometric handgrip exercise; and (c) moderate-intensity isometric handgrip exercise. BP and heart rate variability were recorded immediately before and every 15 minutes. Isometric handgrip exercise protocols, regardless of the intensity, did not lead to significant changes in hemodynamic stability, nor when compared to the control condition (P > .05). The systolic BP and double product significantly increased immediately after the moderate-intensity protocol (122.0 ± 15.9 vs 131.3 ± 19.8, P < .05; 9094.7 ± 1705.7 vs 9783.0 ± 1947.9, P < .05, respectively) but returned to the pre-exercise values 10 minutes later. We conclude that intradialytic isometric handgrip exercise does not induce hemodynamic instability at low and moderate intensities.
血液透析(HD)患者会经历血液动力学不稳定的情况,而透析内运动似乎可以减轻这种情况。本研究旨在验证不同透析内握力运动强度对 HD 患者的急性血液动力学反应。在一项随机、交叉、实验性初步研究中,8 名患者随机完成了两个实验阶段和一个对照阶段:(a)常规 HD;(b)低强度等长握力运动;和(c)中强度等长握力运动。BP 和心率变异性在开始前和每 15 分钟记录一次。无论强度如何,等长握力运动方案都不会导致血液动力学稳定性发生显著变化,与对照条件相比也是如此(P>.05)。中强度方案后,收缩压和双乘积显著增加(122.0±15.9 与 131.3±19.8,P<.05;9094.7±1705.7 与 9783.0±1947.9,P<.05,分别),但 10 分钟后恢复到运动前的值。我们得出结论,低强度和中强度透析内等长握力运动不会引起血液动力学不稳定。