Uhlmann Carmen, Jaeger Susanne, Steinert Tilman, Schmid Petra
Versorgungsforschung Weissenau, ZfP Südwürttemberg, Klinik I für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität Ulm, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg-Weissenau, Deutschland.
Nervenarzt. 2021 May;92(5):468-478. doi: 10.1007/s00115-020-00980-3.
Inpatient care for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders (ICD-10 F3/F4 diagnoses) is provided in Germany in different settings of psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine.
Apart from the question of the effectiveness of treatment, it is of interest whether the course of the disease differs between four different settings up to a period of 1 year after discharge.
A total of 320 patients with main clinical diagnoses from the ICD-10 F3/F4 spectrum were recruited and interviewed consecutively in four treatment settings (psychiatric depression unit, psychiatric crisis intervention unit, psychiatric day hospital, psychosomatic acute hospital). The interviews were conducted after admission, before discharge and 6 and 12 months after discharge.
Overall, treatment in all four settings was shown to be highly effective. The slight increase in symptoms in the postinpatient phase described in the literature was observed across all settings. In terms of treatment intensity, those treated in the crisis intervention unit received the most services after index treatment; however, this group was also the one with the most pronounced symptom burden at admission. Patients treated in the psychosomatic department had the lowest symptom burden at admission and overall received the least inpatient services over the observation period; however, outpatient follow-up treatment was apparently used most by those patients.
The treatments proved to be effective in the long-term in both psychiatric and psychosomatic units. The different settings seem to be successful in adapting the treatments to the respective patient groups.
在德国,针对患有抑郁和焦虑症(国际疾病分类第10版F3/F4诊断)的患者,在不同的精神病学和身心医学环境中提供住院治疗。
除了治疗效果问题外,出院后长达1年的时间里,四种不同环境下的疾病进程是否存在差异也值得关注。
总共招募了320名主要临床诊断属于国际疾病分类第10版F3/F4范围的患者,并在四种治疗环境(精神科抑郁症病房、精神科危机干预病房、精神科日间医院、身心科急症医院)中对他们进行连续访谈。访谈在入院后、出院前以及出院后6个月和12个月进行。
总体而言,所有四种环境下的治疗都显示出高度有效。在所有环境中都观察到了文献中所描述的住院后阶段症状的轻微增加。就治疗强度而言,在危机干预病房接受治疗的患者在索引治疗后接受的服务最多;然而,该组也是入院时症状负担最明显的一组。在身心科接受治疗的患者入院时症状负担最低,在观察期内总体接受的住院服务最少;然而,这些患者显然最常使用门诊随访治疗。
事实证明,无论是在精神科还是身心科单位,这些治疗长期来看都是有效的。不同的环境似乎成功地使治疗适应了各自的患者群体。