School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 Nov;21(7):1353-1361. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13107. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
Challenges with type 1 diabetes (T1D) blood glucose management and illness-related school absences potentially influence children's educational outcomes. However, evidence about the impact of T1D on children's education is mixed. The objectives were to estimate the effects of T1D on children's educational outcomes, and compare time since T1D diagnosis (recent diagnosis [≤2 years] and 3 to 10 years long exposure) on educational outcomes.
This whole-of-population study used de-identified, administrative linked-data from the South Australian Early Childhood Data Project. T1D was identified from hospital ICD-10-AM diagnosis codes (E10, ranging E101 to E109), from 2001 to 2014. Educational outcomes were measured in grade 5 by the National Assessment Program-Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN, 2008-2015) for children born from 1999 to 2005. Analyses were conducted using augmented inverse probability of treatment weighting. Multiple imputations was used to impute missing data.
Among 61 445 children born in South Australia who had undertaken NAPLAN assessments, 162 had T1D. There were negligible differences in the educational outcomes of children with and without T1D, and between recently diagnosed and those with longer exposure. For example, the mean reading score was 482.8 ± 78.9 for children with T1D and 475.5 ± 74.3 for other children. The average treatment effect of 6.8 (95% CI - 6.3-19.9) reflected one-tenth of a SD difference in the mean reading score of children with and without T1D.
Children with T1D performed similarly on literacy and numeracy in grade 5 (age ~ 10-years) compared to children without T1D. This could be due to effective T1D management.
1 型糖尿病(T1D)的血糖管理挑战和与疾病相关的缺课可能会影响儿童的教育成果。然而,关于 T1D 对儿童教育影响的证据参差不齐。本研究的目的是评估 T1D 对儿童教育成果的影响,并比较 T1D 诊断后时间(最近诊断[≤2 年]和 3 至 10 年长期暴露)对教育成果的影响。
这是一项全人群研究,使用了南澳大利亚早期儿童数据项目的去识别、行政关联数据。T1D 是通过医院 ICD-10-AM 诊断代码(E10,范围从 E101 到 E109)从 2001 年到 2014 年确定的。对于 1999 年至 2005 年出生的儿童,在 2008 年至 2015 年期间,通过国家评估计划-读写和算术(NAPLAN)来衡量五年级的教育成果。使用增强逆概率治疗加权法进行分析。使用多重插补法来插补缺失数据。
在南澳大利亚出生并接受 NAPLAN 评估的 61445 名儿童中,有 162 名患有 T1D。患有 T1D 和未患有 T1D 的儿童以及最近诊断和长期暴露的儿童在教育成果方面几乎没有差异。例如,患有 T1D 的儿童的阅读平均得分为 482.8±78.9,而其他儿童的平均得分为 475.5±74.3。T1D 对儿童的平均治疗效应为 6.8(95%CI-6.3-19.9),反映了患有和未患有 T1D 的儿童在阅读得分上的平均差异为十分之一标准差。
与未患有 T1D 的儿童相比,患有 T1D 的儿童在五年级(约 10 岁)的读写和算术能力方面表现相似。这可能是由于有效的 T1D 管理。