• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖析美国高等教育机构间的财政不平等现象。

Decomposing financial inequality across U.S. higher education institutions.

作者信息

Cheslock John J, Shamekhi Yahya

机构信息

Pennsylvania State University, 404B Rackley Building, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.

Pennsylvania State University, 400 Rackley Building, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.

出版信息

Econ Educ Rev. 2020 Oct;78:102035. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102035. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102035
PMID:32834342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7428305/
Abstract

The level of financial inequality among U.S. higher education institutions has important implications for students and society, yet few scholars have examined this topic using established methods for measuring inequality. This paper updates and extends previous work while introducing decompositions that shed light into key trends that we observed for the 2004-2017 period: increasing inequality in total expenditures and decreasing inequality in per-student expenditures. The results of our decomposition highlight how these opposing trends related to rising differences in enrollments and an increasingly positive correlation between an institution's enrollment level and its expenditures per student. Our decomposition results also show that both between-group differences and within-group differences contributed to the observed trends. Further examination of within-group differences reveals that inequality patterns differed meaningfully by institutional type, with doctoral universities and private baccalaureate colleges possessing higher levels of inequality and a more positive correlation between per-student expenditures and enrollments than master's institutions and public associate's colleges.

摘要

美国高等教育机构之间的财政不平等程度对学生和社会有着重要影响,但很少有学者使用既定的不平等衡量方法来研究这一主题。本文在更新和扩展先前工作的同时,引入了分解分析,以揭示我们在2004 - 2017年期间观察到的关键趋势:总支出不平等加剧,而人均支出不平等减少。我们的分解分析结果突出了这些相反趋势如何与入学人数差异的增加以及机构入学水平与其人均支出之间日益增强的正相关关系相关联。我们的分解分析结果还表明,组间差异和组内差异都促成了观察到的趋势。对组内差异的进一步研究表明,不平等模式因机构类型而有显著差异,博士大学和私立学士学位学院的不平等程度更高,且人均支出与入学人数之间的正相关性比硕士机构和公立社区学院更强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/795d/7428305/ff9b64d3469a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/795d/7428305/502b36fc07f7/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/795d/7428305/ff9b64d3469a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/795d/7428305/502b36fc07f7/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/795d/7428305/ff9b64d3469a/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Decomposing financial inequality across U.S. higher education institutions.剖析美国高等教育机构间的财政不平等现象。
Econ Educ Rev. 2020 Oct;78:102035. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102035. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
2
Characterization of human genetics courses for nonbiology majors in U.S. colleges and universities.美国高校非生物学专业人类遗传学课程的特征分析
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Fall;6(3):224-32. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0187.
3
Variations in Student Mental Health and Treatment Utilization Across US Colleges and Universities.美国各高校学生心理健康与治疗利用情况的差异
J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(6):388-96. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1040411.
4
On rising medical student debt: in for a penny, in for a pound.关于医学生债务不断增加的问题:一不做,二不休。
Acad Med. 1996 Oct;71(10):1124-34. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199610000-00024.
5
Organizational resilience: Sustained institutional effectiveness among smaller, private, non-profit US higher education institutions experiencing organizational decline.组织韧性:美国小型私立非营利性高等教育机构在经历组织衰退时的持续机构效能。
Work. 2016 Jun 4;54(2):267-81. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162299.
6
Factors That Predict Institutional Adoption of Professional Physical Therapist Education Programs.预测专业物理治疗师教育计划机构采用的因素。
Phys Ther. 2019 Jul 1;99(7):849-861. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz047.
7
Does it pay to attend a for-profit college? Vertical and horizontal stratification in higher education.上营利性大学划算吗?高等教育中的纵向和横向分层。
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jul;52:161-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
8
For-profit colleges.营利性学院。
Future Child. 2013 Spring;23(1):137-63. doi: 10.1353/foc.2013.0005.
9
Consolidation of Class Advantages in the Wake of the Great Recession: University Enrollments, Educational Opportunity and Stratification.大衰退后阶级优势的巩固:大学入学率、教育机会与分层
Res High Educ. 2021;62(7):915-941. doi: 10.1007/s11162-021-09624-0. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
A national survey of dental hygiene education administrators: demographics, characteristics, and academic profile.一项针对口腔卫生教育管理人员的全国性调查:人口统计学、特征及学术概况。
J Dent Hyg. 1998 Fall;72(4):17-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Stratification of Health Professional Education and Its Funding Disparities: Evidence From China During the Period of 1998-2017.卫生专业教育分层及其经费差距:1998-2017 年中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;9:800163. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.800163. eCollection 2021.