Suppr超能文献

环丙沙星检测方法的比较。

Comparison of ciprofloxacin assays.

作者信息

Weber A, Smith A L, Wong K, Painter B, Krol G

机构信息

Division of Infectious Disease, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Feb;10(2):123-7.

PMID:3283479
Abstract

Two high pressure liquid chromatography methods developed independently and two different microbiological methods assayed samples containing ciprofloxacin derived from four volunteers: 46 sera, 19 saliva and 27 urine specimens. Each subject had received 500 mg of ciprofloxacin by mouth, with the samples collected in the ensuing six hours. Fifteen mock unknowns, prepared by adding known amounts of ciprofloxacin to normal human serum, were also assayed by the four procedures. The limits of sensitivity of the HPLC assays were less than 0.01 microgram/ml; the sensitivity limits of the bioassay were 0.02 microgram/ml (disc method) and 0.06 microgram/ml (well method). The inter-assay data was analyzed by linear regression. Ciprofloxacin concentrations in serum samples correlated well (R = 0.90) with all methods. Values obtained with urine samples also correlated well (R greater than or equal to 0.80). We conclude that either microbiological assay or quantitation by HPLC is satisfactory for quantitation of ciprofloxacin.

摘要

两种独立开发的高压液相色谱法以及两种不同的微生物学方法对来自四名志愿者的含环丙沙星的样本进行了检测

46份血清、19份唾液和27份尿液标本。每位受试者口服了500毫克环丙沙星,并在随后的6小时内采集样本。通过向正常人血清中添加已知量的环丙沙星制备的15份模拟未知样本也采用这四种方法进行了检测。高效液相色谱法的灵敏度极限小于0.01微克/毫升;生物测定法的灵敏度极限分别为0.02微克/毫升(纸片法)和0.06微克/毫升(孔板法)。通过线性回归分析了不同检测方法之间的数据。血清样本中环丙沙星浓度与所有方法的相关性都很好(R = 0.90)。尿液样本获得的值相关性也很好(R≥0.80)。我们得出结论,微生物学检测或高效液相色谱法定量对于环丙沙星的定量都是令人满意的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验