Bollet C, Elena M, Charrel J, Estrangin E, Durand-Gasselin J, Van Gaver P, de Micco P
Laboratoire de Microbiologie et d'Hygiène Hospitalière, Hôpital Salvator, Marseille.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1988 Mar;36(3):203-8.
The authors compare the performances of three identification systems for anaerobic bacteria. The computation of diagnosis ability coefficient (Descamps and Véron) made it possible to classify these systems to identify a batch of eighty strains coming from pathologic samples. The results are very close. This study shows profile catalogues' short coming and the disadvantages of their use which appears to be insufficiently critical. Every-day practice of these supplementary tests and the use of gas-liquid chromatography seem necessary to identify completely the anaerobic bacteria of the studied batch.
作者比较了三种厌氧菌鉴定系统的性能。通过计算诊断能力系数(德康普斯和韦龙),可以对这些系统进行分类,以鉴定一批来自病理样本的80株菌株。结果非常接近。这项研究显示了图谱目录的缺点以及使用它们的不足之处,而这些不足之处似乎未得到充分重视。要完全鉴定所研究批次的厌氧菌,似乎有必要进行这些补充试验的日常实践并使用气液色谱法。