Häyry P, von Willebrand E, Ahonen J, Eklund B, Salmela K, Höckerstedt K, Pettersson E, Koskimies S
Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Transplant Proc. 1988 Apr;20(2 Suppl 2):153-62.
We have investigated the impact of various immunosuppressive drugs and their combinations on the graft, on the intragraft inflammatory patterns of rejection, and on rejection-associated effects in the recipient circulation by fine-needle aspiration biopsy and an extensive computer program. The patients were randomized into three treatment groups, 32 patients each, with the following postoperative immunosuppression: (1) Aza (2.1 mg/kg/d) plus MP (3.6 mg/kg/d tapered to 0.5 mg/kg/d by day 15), (2) CsA (10 mg/kg/d tapered to 8 mg/kd/d by day 28) and, (3) CsA (as above) plus MP (3.6 mg/kg/d tapered to 0 mg/kg/d by day 9). The groups were homogeneous in regard to all tested pretransplantation parameters. Graft parenchymal cell morphology was significantly (P less than .05) deteriorated and urine output reduced in CsA-treated patients, compared to those receiving Aza + MP; concomitant administration of steroids partially (P = NS) protected against the CsA-associated effects. The first episode of inflammation occurred significantly earlier (P less than .001) in patients receiving initially only CsA, compared to those receiving Aza + MP or CsA + MP, the total duration of intragraft inflammation was longer and the clinical signs of rejection were significantly prolonged (.001 less than P less than .05). Although the influx of lymphocytes and monocytes into the graft and the peak intensity of intragraft inflammation was similar in the three groups of patients, the inflammatory patterns of rejection were distinctly different. The number of (T) lymphoblasts in CsA-treated grafts was significantly (P less than .05) lower and their appearance delayed, compared to those treated with Aza + MP and even lower and more delayed in grafts treated initially with CsA + MP. The number of (B) plasmablasts was also reduced and their appearance delayed, but the differences to conventional treatment with Aza + MP were smaller and no longer significant. On the other hand, a significant (P less than .01) early maturation of blood-borne monocytes into tissue macrophages was observed in the CsA-treated grafts in context of first rejection, which was lacking from those treated with CsA + MP or Aza + MP. In the blood, the first episodes of inflammation under CsA were associated with significant (P less than .001) thrombocytosis, which was lacking from the Aza + MP- and CsA + MP-treated patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
我们通过细针穿刺活检和一个广泛的计算机程序,研究了各种免疫抑制药物及其组合对移植物、移植物内排斥反应的炎症模式以及受体循环中与排斥相关的影响。患者被随机分为三个治疗组,每组32例,术后免疫抑制方案如下:(1)硫唑嘌呤(2.1mg/kg/d)加甲泼尼龙(3.6mg/kg/d,至第15天逐渐减至0.5mg/kg/d);(2)环孢素(10mg/kg/d,至第28天逐渐减至8mg/kg/d);(3)环孢素(如上)加甲泼尼龙(3.6mg/kg/d,至第9天逐渐减至0mg/kg/d)。所有检测的移植前参数在各组间均无差异。与接受硫唑嘌呤+甲泼尼龙治疗的患者相比,环孢素治疗的患者移植物实质细胞形态显著恶化(P<0.05),尿量减少;同时给予类固醇部分(P=无显著性差异)预防了环孢素相关的影响。与接受硫唑嘌呤+甲泼尼龙或环孢素+甲泼尼龙治疗的患者相比,最初仅接受环孢素治疗的患者首次炎症发作显著更早(P<0.001),移植物内炎症的总持续时间更长,排斥反应的临床症状显著延长(0.001<P<0.05)。尽管三组患者淋巴细胞和单核细胞流入移植物的情况以及移植物内炎症的峰值强度相似,但排斥反应的炎症模式明显不同。与接受硫唑嘌呤+甲泼尼龙治疗的患者相比,环孢素治疗的移植物中(T)淋巴母细胞数量显著更低(P<0.05),其出现延迟,而最初接受环孢素+甲泼尼龙治疗的移植物中更低且更延迟。(B)成浆细胞数量也减少,其出现延迟,但与硫唑嘌呤+甲泼尼龙传统治疗的差异较小且不再显著。另一方面,在首次排斥反应的背景下,环孢素治疗的移植物中观察到血源性单核细胞显著(P<0.01)早期成熟为组织巨噬细胞,而环孢素+甲泼尼龙或硫唑嘌呤+甲泼尼龙治疗的移植物中则没有。在血液中,环孢素治疗下的首次炎症发作与显著(P<0.001)的血小板增多有关,而硫唑嘌呤+甲泼尼龙和环孢素+甲泼尼龙治疗的患者则没有。(摘要截短至400字)