Suppr超能文献

局灶性癫痫的自主神经功能:左乙拉西坦与卡马西平单药治疗的比较。

Autonomic functions in focal epilepsy: A comparison between lacosamide and carbamazepine monotherapy.

机构信息

Epilepsy Center, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.

Neurology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurol Sci. 2020 Nov 15;418:117095. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117095. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), like sodium channel blockers are significantly associated with autonomic dysfunction in patients with epilepsy. Unlike other sodium-blockers AEDs, lacosamide (LCM) is a third generation AEDs which enhances the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. So far, data about LCM on autonomic nervous system are still unknown. This study was designed to investigate cardiovascular autonomic and sudomotor function in patients affected by focal epilepsy on LCM monotherapy, compared to patients treated with carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy and healthy subjects.

METHODS

Patients on LCM underwent autonomic function tests including head up tilt test (HUTT), Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing, hand grip, and cold face. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed in rest condition and during HUTT. Sudomotor function was assessed through Sudoscan. All results were compared with patients on carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy and with healthy subjects.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients on LCM monotherapy, 12 patients on CBZ monotherapy and 16 healthy controls were studied. At cardiovascular function tests, delta systolic blood pressure (∆SBP) at 3 min of HUTT and ∆SBP early phase II-late phase II at Valsalva maneuver were significantly lower in CBZ group compared to LCM patients. Spectral analysis of HRV showed no significant differences among LCM, CBZ and control groups. No difference in sudomotor function was found in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our findings suggest that LCM and CBZ on monotherapy do not affect autonomic cardiovascular and sudomotor functions compared to controls. Nevertheless, patients on CBZ showed a lower sympathetic reactivity with respect to LCM.

摘要

目的

一些抗癫痫药物(AEDs),如钠离子通道阻滞剂,与癫痫患者的自主神经功能障碍有显著相关性。与其他钠离子阻滞剂 AEDs 不同,拉科酰胺(LCM)是第三代 AEDs,可增强电压门控钠离子通道的缓慢失活。迄今为止,关于 LCM 对自主神经系统的影响的数据仍然未知。本研究旨在比较 LCM 单药治疗与卡马西平(CBZ)单药治疗的局灶性癫痫患者以及健康受试者的心血管自主神经和出汗功能。

方法

接受 LCM 治疗的患者接受自主神经功能测试,包括直立倾斜试验(HUTT)、瓦尔萨尔瓦动作、深呼吸、握力和冷面。在休息状态和 HUTT 期间进行心率变异性(HRV)分析。通过 Sudoscan 评估出汗功能。将所有结果与接受卡马西平(CBZ)单药治疗的患者和健康受试者进行比较。

结果

研究了 14 例接受 LCM 单药治疗、12 例接受 CBZ 单药治疗和 16 例健康对照者。在心血管功能测试中,HUTT 第 3 分钟的收缩压变化(∆SBP)和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作的早期相 II-晚期相 II 的 ∆SBP 在 CBZ 组明显低于 LCM 组。HRV 频谱分析显示 LCM、CBZ 和对照组之间无显著差异。三组间出汗功能无差异。

结论

总之,我们的研究结果表明,与对照组相比,LCM 和 CBZ 单药治疗不会影响自主心血管和出汗功能。然而,与 LCM 相比,CBZ 组的交感神经反应较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验