Sarin S K, Mishra S P, Sachdev G K, Thorat V, Dalal L, Broor S L
Department of Gastroenterology, G.B. Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1988 May;83(5):526-30.
Forty-seven patients with esophageal variceal bleeding were randomly allocated to undergo sclerotherapy on a 3 weekly schedule with either 5% ethanolamine oleate (23 patients) or absolute alcohol (24 patients), in an attempt to compare the efficacy and safety of the two sclerosants. Sclerotherapy with absolute alcohol eradicated esophageal varices significantly earlier compared with ethanolamine oleate (12.9 +/- 5.2 vs 22.3 +/- 8.2 wk, respectively, p less than 0.001). The mean number of injection courses and the mean amount of sclerosant required for variceal obliteration was also significantly (p less than 0.001) less in the alcohol-injected group. Although the total number of rebleeding episodes were significantly (p less than 0.05) less in the alcohol-injected group, the frequency of rebleeding was not significantly different between the two groups (20.8% vs 30.4%, respectively, p greater than 0.05). Two (8.1%) patients died due to rebleeding in the ethanolamine-injected group, whereas in the alcohol group, none died. There was no significant difference in the frequency of complications with the two sclerosants. Besides the relative ease of rapid injection due to its aqueous nature, alcohol is readily available and relatively economical (total cost of sclerosant per patient; alcohol US $0.50, ethanolamine US $60). In conclusion, absolute alcohol appears to be a useful alternative to 5% ethanolamine oleate as a variceal sclerosant.
47例食管静脉曲张出血患者被随机分配,分别接受每3周一次的硬化疗法,其中23例使用5%油酸乙醇胺,24例使用无水酒精,旨在比较两种硬化剂的疗效和安全性。与油酸乙醇胺相比,无水酒精硬化疗法消除食管静脉曲张的时间明显更早(分别为12.9±5.2周和22.3±8.2周,p<0.001)。注射疗程的平均次数以及静脉曲张闭塞所需硬化剂的平均用量在酒精注射组中也显著更少(p<0.001)。虽然酒精注射组再次出血发作的总数明显更少(p<0.05),但两组之间的再出血频率无显著差异(分别为20.8%和30.4%,p>0.05)。油酸乙醇胺注射组有2例(8.1%)患者因再出血死亡,而酒精组无死亡病例。两种硬化剂的并发症发生率无显著差异。除了因其水性性质相对易于快速注射外,酒精容易获得且相对经济(每位患者硬化剂的总成本;酒精0.50美元,油酸乙醇胺60美元)。总之,无水酒精似乎是一种有用的替代5%油酸乙醇胺的静脉曲张硬化剂。