Suppr超能文献

油酸乙醇胺与无水乙醇作为曲张静脉硬化剂的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。

Ethanolamine oleate versus absolute alcohol as a variceal sclerosant: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Sarin S K, Mishra S P, Sachdev G K, Thorat V, Dalal L, Broor S L

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, G.B. Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1988 May;83(5):526-30.

PMID:3284336
Abstract

Forty-seven patients with esophageal variceal bleeding were randomly allocated to undergo sclerotherapy on a 3 weekly schedule with either 5% ethanolamine oleate (23 patients) or absolute alcohol (24 patients), in an attempt to compare the efficacy and safety of the two sclerosants. Sclerotherapy with absolute alcohol eradicated esophageal varices significantly earlier compared with ethanolamine oleate (12.9 +/- 5.2 vs 22.3 +/- 8.2 wk, respectively, p less than 0.001). The mean number of injection courses and the mean amount of sclerosant required for variceal obliteration was also significantly (p less than 0.001) less in the alcohol-injected group. Although the total number of rebleeding episodes were significantly (p less than 0.05) less in the alcohol-injected group, the frequency of rebleeding was not significantly different between the two groups (20.8% vs 30.4%, respectively, p greater than 0.05). Two (8.1%) patients died due to rebleeding in the ethanolamine-injected group, whereas in the alcohol group, none died. There was no significant difference in the frequency of complications with the two sclerosants. Besides the relative ease of rapid injection due to its aqueous nature, alcohol is readily available and relatively economical (total cost of sclerosant per patient; alcohol US $0.50, ethanolamine US $60). In conclusion, absolute alcohol appears to be a useful alternative to 5% ethanolamine oleate as a variceal sclerosant.

摘要

47例食管静脉曲张出血患者被随机分配,分别接受每3周一次的硬化疗法,其中23例使用5%油酸乙醇胺,24例使用无水酒精,旨在比较两种硬化剂的疗效和安全性。与油酸乙醇胺相比,无水酒精硬化疗法消除食管静脉曲张的时间明显更早(分别为12.9±5.2周和22.3±8.2周,p<0.001)。注射疗程的平均次数以及静脉曲张闭塞所需硬化剂的平均用量在酒精注射组中也显著更少(p<0.001)。虽然酒精注射组再次出血发作的总数明显更少(p<0.05),但两组之间的再出血频率无显著差异(分别为20.8%和30.4%,p>0.05)。油酸乙醇胺注射组有2例(8.1%)患者因再出血死亡,而酒精组无死亡病例。两种硬化剂的并发症发生率无显著差异。除了因其水性性质相对易于快速注射外,酒精容易获得且相对经济(每位患者硬化剂的总成本;酒精0.50美元,油酸乙醇胺60美元)。总之,无水酒精似乎是一种有用的替代5%油酸乙醇胺的静脉曲张硬化剂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验