Suppr超能文献

单吻合口十二指肠空肠旁路术(SADI-S)与单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)作为袖状胃切除术后体重复发患者的翻修术:疗效和结果的比较分析。

Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileostomy (SADI-S) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as Revisional Procedures for Patients with Weight Recidivism After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2020 Dec;30(12):4715-4723. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04933-2. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Many revisional procedures are available for unsuccessful laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with complications or weight recidivism. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI-S) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) are two revisional procedures to address the problem of weight recidivism. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of the 2 revisional approaches (SADI-S vs. OAGB-MGB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected database of patients who underwent SADI-S or OAGB-MGB as a revisional procedure for weight recidivism after primary LSG with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Weight loss, comorbidities, nutritional deficiencies, complications, and outcomes were compared in the 2 procedures.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were included in the study (42 SADI-S and 49 OAGB-MGB). There was a significant weight loss (total weight loss percentage, TWL%) at 1-year follow-up observed for SADI-S when compared to OAGB-MGB (23.7 ± 5.7 vs. 18.7 ± 8.5, p = 0.02). However, this difference was not statistically significant at 18 months (26.4 ± 7.3 vs. 21.2 ± 11.0, p = 0.25). Remission of comorbidities (diabetes mellitus and hypertension) was comparable. Although OAGB-MGB had higher complication rate than SADI-S, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.39). No mortality was reported in the study groups.

CONCLUSION

Both SADI-S and OAGB-MGB are effective and safe revisional procedures for weight regain after LSG. The short-term outcomes are comparable; however, SADI-S is associated with less upper gastrointestinal complications and could be a better option for patients suffering from GERD post-LSG. Moreover, the underlying bile reflux may get worse with OAGB-MGB. However, further prospective larger studies are needed.

摘要

目的

对于出现并发症或体重反弹的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)失败患者,有许多翻修手术可供选择。单吻合口十二指肠-空肠旁路术(SADI-S)和单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)是两种针对体重反弹问题的翻修手术。我们旨在评估这两种翻修方法(SADI-S 与 OAGB-MGB)的疗效和结果。

材料与方法

对因 LSG 后体重反弹而行 SADI-S 或 OAGB-MGB 作为翻修术的患者进行前瞻性数据库回顾性分析,这些患者均具有至少 1 年的随访资料。比较两种手术的减重效果、合并症、营养缺乏、并发症和结局。

结果

研究共纳入 91 例患者(42 例行 SADI-S,49 例行 OAGB-MGB)。SADI-S 组患者在 1 年随访时体重减轻量明显大于 OAGB-MGB 组(总减重百分比,TWL%:23.7±5.7% vs. 18.7±8.5%,p=0.02)。然而,在 18 个月时,这种差异无统计学意义(26.4±7.3% vs. 21.2±11.0%,p=0.25)。合并症(糖尿病和高血压)的缓解情况相当。尽管 OAGB-MGB 的并发症发生率高于 SADI-S,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.39)。两组均无死亡病例。

结论

SADI-S 和 OAGB-MGB 均是 LSG 后体重反弹的有效且安全的翻修手术。短期结果相当,但 SADI-S 与上消化道并发症较少相关,对于 LSG 后患有 GERD 的患者可能是更好的选择。此外,OAGB-MGB 可能会导致潜在的胆汁反流加重。但仍需要进一步开展前瞻性的大型研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验