关于 Zhong 和 Langrish（2020）的“不同物理胃部模型的比较以及这些系统中剪应力和剪应变的分析”的进一步评论。
Further comments on "A comparison of different physical stomach models and an analysis of shear stresses and strains in these system" by Zhong and Langrish (2020).
机构信息
School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Material Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China.
School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Material Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China.
出版信息
Food Res Int. 2020 Oct;136:109542. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109542. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
Recently, Zhong and Langrish (2020a) presented an excellent review on typical in vitro physical stomach models reported in literature with an emphasis on their structures, materials, peristalsis, shear stress, pros and cons. We read it with great interest and provided further information (Wu & Chen, 2020) on our home-made rat and human stomach systems which were discussed in the review. Zhong and Langrish (2020b) followed up with a response letter to our note providing their observations on the matters. The current letter hopefully provides a sufficient response to their comments. It is believed through this back-and-forth process, the issues of uncertainty are nicely clarified for interested readers.
最近，Zhong 和 Langrish（2020a）发表了一篇关于文献中报道的典型体外物理胃模型的精彩综述，重点介绍了它们的结构、材料、蠕动、剪切应力、优缺点。我们饶有兴趣地阅读了这篇综述，并提供了我们自制的大鼠和人体胃系统的进一步信息（Wu & Chen，2020），这些系统在综述中进行了讨论。Zhong 和 Langrish（2020b）随后针对我们的注释发来了一封回复信，提供了他们对这些问题的看法。希望这封信能够对他们的评论做出充分的回应。通过这种来回的过程，相信感兴趣的读者可以很好地澄清这些不确定的问题。
Zotero 插件