• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自适应前向碰撞警告系统的不良行为适应:主任务和次要任务性能的研究。

Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance.

机构信息

AUDI AG, D-85045 Ingolstadt, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstraße 41, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105718. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105718. Epub 2020 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105718
PMID:32847736
Abstract

Advanced driver assistance systems can effectively support drivers but can also induce unwanted effects in behavior. The present study investigates this adverse behavioral adaptation in adaptive Forward Collision Warning (FCW) systems. Other than conventional FCW systems that provide warnings based on static Time-To-Collision (TTC) thresholds, adaptive FCW systems consider the driver's need for support by adjusting warning thresholds according to distraction. A neglected question is how drivers adapt their behavior when they use adaptive FCW systems under realistic conditions, i.e., when warnings occur infrequently but system functionality is anticipated. Forty-eight participants drove with two different FCW systems (adaptive vs. non-adaptive) while working on a secondary in-vehicle task in a driving simulator. During the main part of the experiment, no brake events occurred and hence FCW functioning was largely anticipated. Additionally, visual system feedback about the driver's distraction state was manipulated between groups. Participants had significantly shorter minimal time-headways and TTCs when driving with the adaptive relative to the non-adaptive system. Participants with system feedback about distraction state spent generally more time with engaging in the secondary task. These results indicate behavioral adaptation which, however, is restricted to the task that is specifically supported by the system, namely longitudinal control.

摘要

高级驾驶员辅助系统可以有效地为驾驶员提供支持,但也可能在行为上产生不良影响。本研究调查了自适应前方碰撞警告(FCW)系统中的这种不利的行为适应性。除了基于静态碰撞时间(TTC)阈值提供警告的传统 FCW 系统外,自适应 FCW 系统还通过根据驾驶员的分心程度调整警告阈值来考虑驾驶员的支持需求。一个被忽视的问题是,当驾驶员在现实条件下使用自适应 FCW 系统时,即当警告不频繁但预计系统功能时,他们如何调整自己的行为。48 名参与者在驾驶模拟器中进行了两项不同的 FCW 系统(自适应与非自适应)的驾驶,同时在车内进行次要任务。在实验的主要部分,没有发生制动事件,因此很大程度上可以预计 FCW 的功能。此外,还在组间操纵了关于驾驶员分心状态的视觉系统反馈。与非自适应系统相比,参与者在使用自适应系统时的最小车头时距和 TTC 明显缩短。有关分心状态的系统反馈的参与者通常会花费更多的时间来从事次要任务。这些结果表明存在行为适应性,但这种适应性仅限于系统特别支持的任务,即纵向控制。

相似文献

1
Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance.自适应前向碰撞警告系统的不良行为适应:主任务和次要任务性能的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105718. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105718. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
2
Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.自适应前向碰撞警告:不完美技术对行为适应、警告有效性和接受度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:217-229. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 4.
3
Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.来自100辆汽车自然驾驶研究的制动时碰撞时间的年龄和性别差异。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S15-20. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.928703.
4
Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?驾驶配备部分自主式前方碰撞预警系统的汽车:驾驶员的反应如何?
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):698-708. doi: 10.1177/0018720812439712.
5
Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust.带有前向碰撞警告系统的模拟器培训:对驾驶员-系统交互和驾驶员信任的影响。
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):709-21. doi: 10.1177/0018720812441796.
6
Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.分心驾驶员对行人前碰撞预警系统的制动反应。
J Safety Res. 2017 Jun;61:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.来自100辆汽车自然驾驶研究的超车操作过程中的驾驶员行为。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S176-81. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1057281.
8
Gaze position modulates the effectiveness of forward collision warnings for drowsy drivers.注视方向调节了瞌睡驾驶员前方碰撞警告的有效性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 May;126:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
9
Population distributions of time to collision at brake application during car following from naturalistic driving data.基于自然驾驶数据的跟车过程中制动时碰撞时间的人口分布。
J Safety Res. 2015 Sep;54:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
An electrophysiological study of the impact of a Forward Collision Warning System in a simulator driving task.一项关于前向碰撞预警系统在模拟器驾驶任务中影响的电生理学研究。
Brain Res. 2012 Aug 27;1470:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.06.027. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Numerical Analysis of an Autonomous Emergency Braking System for Rear-End Collisions of Electric Bicycles.电动自行车追尾碰撞自动紧急制动系统的数值分析
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 26;24(1):137. doi: 10.3390/s24010137.
2
Comparison of Experienced and Novice Drivers' Visual and Driving Behaviors during Warned or Unwarned Near-Forward Collisions.有经验和新手驾驶员在有预警或无预警的近前方碰撞过程中的视觉与驾驶行为比较
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;23(19):8150. doi: 10.3390/s23198150.
3
Understanding the domain of driving distraction with knowledge graphs.
利用知识图谱理解驾驶分心领域。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 9;17(12):e0278822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278822. eCollection 2022.