Ingle J N, Twito D I, Schaid D J, Cullinan S A, Krook J E, Mailliard J A, Marschke R F, Long H J, Gerstner J G, Windschitl H E
Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
J Clin Oncol. 1988 May;6(5):825-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.5.825.
A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if combination hormonal therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) and fluoxymesterone (FLU) was more efficacious than TAM alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients failing TAM could subsequently receive FLU. The dose of both drugs was 10 mg orally twice daily. Objective responses were seen in 50 of 119 TAM patients (42%) and 63 of 119 TAM plus FLU patients (53%) (one-sided P = .05). Time to disease progression distributions were better for TAM plus FLU (median, 350 days v 199 days), but the log rank test only approached statistical significance (one-sided P = .07). Duration of response and survival distributions were similar between the two treatment arms. Toxicities, in terms of androgenic side effects, were greater on the TAM plus FLU regimen. Fifty-two patients are evaluable for response with FLU following TAM and 21 (40%) have achieved a response. We conclude that the advantages in terms of response rate and time to progression observed with TAM plus FLU probably represent a biological effect, but are not of sufficient magnitude to justify the routine clinical use of this combination given the lack of survival advantage and side effects encountered.
进行了一项随机临床试验,以确定他莫昔芬(TAM)与氟甲睾酮(FLU)联合激素治疗对于绝经后转移性乳腺癌女性的疗效是否优于单独使用TAM。TAM治疗失败的患者随后可接受FLU治疗。两种药物的剂量均为每日口服两次,每次10mg。119例TAM治疗患者中有50例(42%)出现客观缓解,119例TAM联合FLU治疗患者中有63例(53%)出现客观缓解(单侧P = 0.05)。TAM联合FLU治疗的疾病进展时间分布更好(中位数,350天对199天),但对数秩检验仅接近统计学显著性(单侧P = 0.07)。两个治疗组之间的缓解持续时间和生存分布相似。就雄激素副作用而言,TAM联合FLU方案的毒性更大。52例患者在接受TAM治疗后可评估对FLU的反应,其中21例(40%)获得了反应。我们得出结论,TAM联合FLU在缓解率和疾病进展时间方面观察到的优势可能代表一种生物学效应,但鉴于缺乏生存优势且存在副作用,其优势程度不足以证明该联合方案可常规用于临床。