Gao Fei, Li Nan, Xu YongMei, Yang GuoWang
Department of Oncology & Hematology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Graduate School, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 28;10:1135. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01135. eCollection 2020.
The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in resected stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the effect of PORT on survival of resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients. Resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients aged 18 years or older were identified from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database from 2010 to 2015. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors including PORT associated with survival time. A subgroup analysis of patients stratified by number of lymph node metastases was also performed. Overall survival (OS) and overall mortality were compared among the different groups. A total of 3,445 patients were included in the study. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that PORT had no significant impact on survival of patients with <6 positive lymph node [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.012, = 0.858, 95% CI: 0.886-1.156]. Postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) (HR = 0.605, < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.468-0.783) and PORT (HR = 0.724, = 0.007, 95% CI: 0.574-0.914) are both favorable prognostic factors for stage IIIA-N2 patients with ≥6 positive lymph nodes. In 2,735 patients who featured <6 number of positive regional lymph nodes, patients who received PORT had better survival and lower 3-years and 5-years overall mortality rate than patients who underwent surgery only (41 vs. 28 months, < 0.015). There was no significant difference in the survival of postoperative patients who underwent POCT in view of whether received PORT (44 vs. 53 months, = 0.176). A total of 710 patients who featured ≥6 number of positive regional lymph node metastasis were divided into two groups by PORT. PORT did not prolong survival for postoperative patients who did not receive chemotherapy (12 vs. 15 months, = 0.632). PORT showed a significant advantage in influencing OS in patients who received PORT combined with POCT as compared with those who received POCT only (32 vs. 25 months, = 0.006). For IIIA-N2 patients with <6 lymph node metastases, use of PORT can be encouraged to improve survival. For patients with ≥6 positive lymph nodes, PORT combined with POCT significantly improved OS and decreased overall mortality.
术后放疗(PORT)在已切除的IIIA - N2期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨PORT对已切除的IIIA - N2期NSCLC患者生存的影响。从2010年至2015年的SEER(监测、流行病学和最终结果)数据库中识别出年龄在18岁及以上的已切除IIIA - N2期NSCLC患者。采用Cox回归分析来确定包括PORT在内的与生存时间相关的因素。还对按淋巴结转移数量分层的患者进行了亚组分析。比较了不同组之间的总生存期(OS)和总死亡率。本研究共纳入3445例患者。多变量Cox分析显示,PORT对淋巴结阳性数<6的患者的生存没有显著影响[风险比(HR)= 1.012,P = 0.858,95%置信区间:0.886 - 1.156]。术后化疗(POCT)(HR = 0.605,P < 0.001,95%置信区间:0.468 - 0.783)和PORT(HR = 0.724,P = 0.007,95%置信区间:0.574 - 0.914)都是IIIA - N2期淋巴结阳性数≥6的患者的有利预后因素。在2735例区域淋巴结阳性数<6的患者中,接受PORT的患者比仅接受手术的患者有更好的生存和更低的3年及5年总死亡率(41个月对28个月,P < 0.015)。考虑是否接受PORT,接受POCT的术后患者的生存没有显著差异(44个月对53个月,P = 0.176)。710例区域淋巴结阳性转移数≥6的患者按PORT分为两组。PORT对未接受化疗的术后患者的生存没有延长作用(12个月对15个月,P = 0.632)。与仅接受POCT的患者相比,PORT在联合POCT的患者中对OS有显著优势(32个月对25个月,P = 0.006)。对于IIIA - N2期淋巴结转移数<6的患者,可鼓励使用PORT以提高生存率。对于淋巴结阳性数≥6的患者,PORT联合POCT可显著改善OS并降低总死亡率。