Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中用于识别听力受损老年人的筛查工具的验证

Validation of screening tools for identifying hearing-impaired elderly in primary care.

作者信息

Lichtenstein M J, Bess F H, Logan S A

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.

出版信息

JAMA. 1988 May 20;259(19):2875-8.

PMID:3285039
Abstract

Two instruments for the detection of hearing impairment, the Welch-Allyn audioscope (Welch-Allyn Inc, Skaneateles Falls, NY) and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly--Screening Version (HHIE-S), were validated against pure tone audiometry in 178 patients over 65 years old screened in primary care practice. The prevalence of hearing impairment in this sample was 30%. The audioscope yielded reproducible results in the physicians' offices and a hearing center. The sensitivity of the audioscope was 94% in both locations, while its specificity was 90% in the hearing center and 72% in the physicians' offices. The HHIE-S yielded reproducible results between the two test locations. An HHIE-S score from 0 to 8 resulted in a likelihood ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.68), and a score of 26 or more yielded a likelihood ratio of 12.00 (95% confidence interval, 2.62 to 55.00) for predicting the presence of hearing impairment. Used together, the two instruments had a test accuracy of 83%. The audioscope and HHIE-S are valid, reliable, inexpensive tools for detecting hearing impairment in the elderly.

摘要

在初级保健机构筛查的178名65岁以上患者中,将两种听力障碍检测工具——伟伦听力计(伟伦公司,纽约州斯卡奈特勒斯福尔斯)和老年人听力障碍筛查量表(HHIE-S)——与纯音听力测试进行了验证。该样本中听力障碍的患病率为30%。听力计在医生办公室和听力中心均产生了可重复的结果。在这两个地点,听力计的灵敏度均为94%,而其在听力中心的特异性为90%,在医生办公室为72%。HHIE-S在两个测试地点之间产生了可重复的结果。HHIE-S得分为0至8时,预测听力障碍存在的似然比为0.36(95%置信区间,从0.1至0.68),得分26或更高时,似然比为12.00(95%置信区间,从2.62至55.00)。两种工具联合使用时,测试准确性为83%。听力计和HHIE-S是检测老年人听力障碍的有效、可靠且廉价的工具。 (注:原文中“0.19 to 0.68”翻译为“从0.1至0.68”可能不太准确,更准确的是“0.19至0.68”,但按照要求未添加解释说明,此处仅为指出可能的问题。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验