Suppr超能文献

抗生素轮换策略对重症监护病房抗生素耐药菌感染或定植的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Effect of Antibiotic-Cycling Strategy on Antibiotic-Resistant Bacterial Infections or Colonization in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Intensive Care Unit, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China.

出版信息

Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Aug;17(4):319-328. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12454.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, especially multidrug-resistant strains, play a key role in impeding critical patients from survival and recovery. The effectiveness of the empiric use of antibiotics in the circling manner in intensive care units (ICUs) has not been analyzed in detail and remains controversial. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate antibiotic-cycling effect on the incidence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science for studies focusing on whether a cycling strategy of empiric use of antibiotics could curb the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in ICUs. The major outcomes were risk ratios (RRs) of antibiotic-resistant infections or colonization per 1,000 patient days before and after the implementation of antibiotic cycling. A random-effects model was adopted to estimate results in consideration of clinical heterogeneity among studies. The registration number of the meta-analysis is CRD42018094464.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, involving 2,261 episodes of resistant infections or colonization and 160,129 patient days, were included in the final analysis. Based on the available evidence, the antibiotic-cycling strategy did not reduce the overall incidence of infections or colonization with resistant bacteria (RR = 0.823, 95% CI 0.655-1.035, p = .095). In subgroup analyses, the cycling strategy cut down the incidence of resistant bacteria more significantly than baseline period (p = .028) but showed no difference in comparison with mixing strategy (p = .758).

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

Although the cycling strategy performed better than relatively free usage of antibiotics in the baseline period on reducing resistant bacteria, the cycling strategy did not show advantage when compared with the mixing strategy in subgroup analyses. In addition, these viewpoints still need more evidence to confirm.

摘要

背景

抗生素耐药菌,尤其是多药耐药株,在阻碍重症患者存活和康复方面起着关键作用。在重症监护病房(ICU)中以循环方式使用经验性抗生素的效果尚未得到详细分析,并且存在争议。因此,进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估抗生素循环对抗生素耐药菌发生率的影响。

方法

我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库和 Web of Science,以寻找关注经验性使用抗生素的循环策略是否可以抑制 ICU 中抗生素耐药菌流行的研究。主要结局是在实施抗生素循环前后每 1000 个患者日发生抗生素耐药感染或定植的风险比(RR)。考虑到研究之间的临床异质性,采用随机效应模型来估计结果。荟萃分析的注册号为 CRD42018094464。

结果

最终纳入了 12 项研究,共涉及 2261 例耐药感染或定植和 160129 个患者日。基于现有证据,抗生素循环策略并未降低总体耐药菌感染或定植发生率(RR=0.823,95%CI 0.655-1.035,p=0.095)。在亚组分析中,与基线期相比,循环策略降低了耐药菌的发生率(p=0.028),但与混合策略相比无差异(p=0.758)。

行动的联系

尽管循环策略在基线期相对于相对自由使用抗生素在减少耐药菌方面表现更好,但在亚组分析中与混合策略相比,循环策略并未显示出优势。此外,这些观点仍需要更多证据来证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验