Light Pharma, Cambridge, MA.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Aug;4:769-783. doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00103.
This work summarizes the benefit and risk of the results of clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration of therapies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using number needed to benefit (NNB) and number needed to harm (NNH) metrics. NNB and NNH metrics have been reported as potentially being more patient centric and more intuitive to medical practitioners than more common metrics, such as the hazard ratio, and valuable to medical practitioners in complementing other metrics, such as the median time to event. This approach involved the characterization of efficacy and safety results in terms of NNB and NNH of 30 clinical trials in advanced NSCLC supporting US Food and Drug Administration approval decisions from 2003 to 2017. We assessed trends of NNB over time of treatment (eg, for programmed death 1 inhibitors) and variation of NNB across subpopulations (eg, characterized by epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, programmed death ligand 1 expression, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, age, and extent of disease progression). Furthermore, the evolution of NNB of treatments for advanced NSCLC was charted from 2003 to 2017. Across subpopulations, NNB, on average, was 4 patients for approved targeted therapies in molecularly enriched populations, 11 patients for approved therapies in nonmolecularly enriched populations, and 23 patients for withdrawn or unapproved therapies. Furthermore, the NNB analysis showed variation for attributes of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, level of programmed death 1 expression, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, etc. When considering the best-case subpopulations and available drugs, the NNB frontier reduced from an estimated value of 7.7 in 2003 to an estimated value of 2.5 in 2017 at the estimated median overall survival-equal to 6 months-of an untreated patient.
这项工作总结了 2003 年至 2017 年间美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的用于治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的 30 项临床试验的疗效和安全性结果,使用需要治疗的人数(NNB)和需要治疗的人数(NNH)这两个指标来衡量获益和风险。与更常见的指标(如风险比)相比,NNB 和 NNH 指标被认为更能以患者为中心,更直观,对于补充其他指标(如中位时间至事件),对医疗从业者来说更有价值。我们评估了治疗时间(如程序性死亡 1 抑制剂)和亚组间 NNH 变化的 NNB 趋势(如表皮生长因子受体突变、程序性死亡配体 1 表达、东部合作肿瘤组表现状态、年龄和疾病进展程度)。此外,还绘制了从 2003 年到 2017 年晚期 NSCLC 治疗方法的 NNB 演变图。在亚组中,平均而言,在分子富集人群中批准的靶向治疗药物有 4 例,在非分子富集人群中批准的治疗药物有 11 例,撤回或未批准的治疗药物有 23 例。此外,NNB 分析显示了表皮生长因子受体突变、程序性死亡 1 表达水平、东部合作肿瘤组表现状态等属性的差异。当考虑最佳亚组和可用药物时,NNB 前沿从 2003 年的估计值 7.7 减少到 2017 年的估计值 2.5,相当于未治疗患者的估计中位总生存时间(6 个月)相等。