Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Palaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Aug 27;14(8):e0008600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008600. eCollection 2020 Aug.
Helminth infections are among the World Health Organization's top neglected diseases with significant impact in many Less Economically Developed Countries. Despite no longer being endemic in Europe, the widespread presence of helminth eggs in archaeological deposits indicates that helminths represented a considerable burden in past European populations. Prevalence of infection is a key epidemiological feature that would influence the elimination of endemic intestinal helminths, for example, low prevalence rates may have made it easier to eliminate these infections in Europe without the use of modern anthelminthic drugs. To determine historical prevalence rates we analysed 589 grave samples from 7 European sites dated between 680 and 1700 CE, identifying two soil transmitted nematodes (Ascaris spp. and Trichuris trichiura) at all locations, and two food derived cestodes (Diphyllobothrium latum and Taenia spp.) at 4 sites. The rates of nematode infection in the medieval populations (1.5 to 25.6% for T. trichiura; 9.3-42.9% for Ascaris spp.) were comparable to those reported within modern endemically infected populations. There was some evidence of higher levels of nematode infection in younger individuals but not at all sites. The genetic diversity of T. trichiura ITS-1 in single graves was variable but much lower than with communal medieval latrine deposits. The prevalence of food derived cestodes was much lower (1.0-9.9%) than the prevalence of nematodes. Interestingly, sites that contained Taenia spp. eggs also contained D. latum which may reflect local culinary practices. These data demonstrate the importance of helminth infections in Medieval Europe and provide a baseline for studies on the epidemiology of infection in historical and modern contexts. Since the prevalence of medieval STH infections mirror those in modern endemic countries the factors affecting STH decline in Europe may also inform modern intervention campaigns.
蠕虫感染是世界卫生组织(WHO)重点关注的被忽视疾病之一,在许多经济欠发达国家造成了重大影响。尽管在欧洲已不再流行,但在考古沉积物中发现大量的蠕虫卵表明,在过去的欧洲人群中,蠕虫感染是一个相当大的负担。感染的流行率是一个关键的流行病学特征,它将影响到消除地方性肠道蠕虫感染,例如,低流行率可能使欧洲更容易在不使用现代驱虫药物的情况下消除这些感染。为了确定历史流行率,我们分析了来自 7 个欧洲地点的 589 个坟墓样本,这些样本的年代在公元 680 年至 1700 年之间,在所有地点都发现了两种土壤传播的线虫(Ascaris spp.和 Trichuris trichiura),在 4 个地点发现了两种食源性绦虫(Diphyllobothrium latum 和 Taenia spp.)。在中世纪人群中,线虫感染率(T. trichiura 为 1.5%至 25.6%;Ascaris spp.为 9.3%至 42.9%)与现代流行地区报告的感染率相当。在年轻个体中,线虫感染的证据有些增加,但并非在所有地点都如此。单个坟墓中 T. trichiura ITS-1 的遗传多样性是可变的,但远低于中世纪公共厕所沉积物。食源性绦虫的流行率(1.0%至 9.9%)远低于线虫。有趣的是,含有 Taenia spp.卵的地点也含有 D. latum,这可能反映了当地的烹饪习惯。这些数据表明,蠕虫感染在中世纪欧洲非常重要,并为历史和现代背景下感染的流行病学研究提供了基线。由于中世纪 STH 感染的流行率与现代流行地区的流行率相似,因此影响欧洲 STH 下降的因素也可能为现代干预措施提供信息。