Suppr超能文献

促进无家可归者获得牙科护理。

Facilitating Access to Dental Care for People Experiencing Homelessness.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, Oral Health Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021 Oct;6(4):420-429. doi: 10.1177/2380084420952350. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fear, lack of information, and lower health literacy are prominent barriers preventing people experiencing homelessness from accessing dental services. Most of this population are eligible for free dental treatment in Australia, yet few access care. This study evaluated 3 models for facilitating access to dental services for people experiencing homelessness.

METHODS

Three facilitated access models were developed and implemented at 4 community organizations. In model 1, dental appointments were booked on the spot after a screening by dental practitioners. Model 2 also involved dental screenings followed by appointments made via phone call from the service. In model 3, the community organizations referred clients directly to the service where appointments were made via a phone call to the client. The models were trialed with community organizations between 2017 and 2019. For each model, participant demographic information, attendance at subsequent dental appointments, and program operation resource use were collected. Cost-effectiveness was assessed as an incremental cost per additional person attending a dental appointment.

RESULTS

A total of 76 people participated in model 1, 66 in model 2, and 43 in model 3. Model 1 was the most effective, leading to 84.2 (confidence interval, 75.8-92.7) of every 100 participants attending a dental appointment. Model 2 had a lower effectiveness of 56.1 (44.6-67.6), and model 3 was the least effective, with a mean of 29.3 (15.0-43.6) per 100 participants attending. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $51 per additional person attending a dental appointment for model 3 (compared to no strategy) and $173 per additional person attending for model 1 (compared to model 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Model 3 was the most cost-effective strategy of increasing access to dental care for people experiencing homelessness. Decision makers who find the effectiveness of model 3 insufficient should look instead to employ model 1 or a combination of these 2 models. The importance of face-to-face engagement to foster trust between the individual and health care practitioner was evident.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

This study provides a range of models for dental and community services to facilitate access to dental care for people experiencing homelessness. Decision makers should consider the needs of vulnerable populations, alternative model designs, and their cost-effectiveness when implementing models of facilitated access to dental care. Face-to-face engagement between clients and dental practitioners by inclusion of a screening stage appears to be instrumental in overcoming barriers to access clinical care.

摘要

简介

恐惧、信息匮乏和较低的健康素养是阻碍无家可归者获得牙科服务的突出障碍。澳大利亚的大多数无家可归者都有资格获得免费的牙科治疗,但很少有人接受治疗。本研究评估了促进无家可归者获得牙科服务的 3 种模式。

方法

在 4 个社区组织中开发并实施了 3 种便利获取模式。在模式 1 中,在牙科医生进行筛查后,当场预约牙科治疗。模式 2 同样涉及牙科筛查,然后通过服务电话安排预约。在模式 3 中,社区组织将客户直接转介到服务机构,客户通过电话预约。在 2017 年至 2019 年期间,这 3 种模式在社区组织中进行了试用。对于每种模式,都收集了参与者的人口统计学信息、后续牙科预约的出席情况以及项目运营资源的使用情况。成本效益评估为每增加一人接受牙科治疗的额外成本。

结果

共有 76 人参加了模式 1,66 人参加了模式 2,43 人参加了模式 3。模式 1 的效果最好,每 100 名参与者中有 84.2 人(置信区间为 75.8-92.7)参加了牙科预约。模式 2 的效果较低,为 56.1(44.6-67.6),模式 3 的效果最差,平均每 100 名参与者中有 29.3 人(15.0-43.6)参加。增量成本效益比分别为 3 模式(与无策略相比)每增加一人接受牙科治疗的 51 美元和 1 模式(与 3 模式相比)每增加一人接受牙科治疗的 173 美元。

结论

模式 3 是增加无家可归者获得牙科护理的最具成本效益的策略。如果决策者认为模式 3 的效果不够理想,他们应该考虑采用模式 1 或这两种模式的组合。在促进个人与医疗保健从业者之间的信任方面,面对面的接触非常重要。

知识转移声明

本研究为牙科和社区服务提供了一系列模式,以促进无家可归者获得牙科护理。决策者在实施便利获得牙科护理的模式时,应考虑弱势群体的需求、替代模式设计及其成本效益。客户与牙科医生之间的面对面接触,包括筛查阶段,似乎是克服获得临床护理障碍的关键。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验