Liu H, Shi Y, Zhang G N, Yu J, Xu S Q, Wang D F, Fan Y, Song S Q, Zhou F Z
Departments of Gynecological Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 25;55(8):521-528. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200313-00218.
To introduce the technical essentials of cytoreduction surgery (CRS) with extensive peritonectomy ("rolling carpet" surgery) in stage Ⅲc epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and evaluate the feasibility and safety of the operation by analyzing the incidence of surgical complications and perioperative mortality. From December 2017 to December 2019, 30 patients with stage IIIc EOC who underwent "rolled carpet" CRS and 30 patients who underwent traditional CRS at the same period in Sichuan Cancer Hospital were collected. To summarize the key points of "rolled carpet" CRS operation technology, i.e. the extraperitoneal space was the cut path of ovarian cancer operation, and the tumor in the pelvic cavity was dissociated from the extraperitoneal space of the pelvic cavity. The tumor in the pelvic cavity and all the implants or potential metastases on the parietal peritoneum were removed completely. The clinical and pathological characteristics between the two groups were analyzed retrospectively, and the feasibility and safety of "rolling carpet" CRS were evaluated by comparing the operation related indexes and the occurrence of surgical complications between the two groups. (1) Clinicopathological features: the age of patients in "rolling carpet" CRS group and traditional CRS group were respectively (55.4±9.6) and (54.6±9.5) years, and the median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 12 (range, 4-24) and 10 (range, 5-18), respectively. There were no statistical significance between the two groups (all >0.05). (2) Operation related indexes: in the "rolled carpet" CRS group, all patients (100%, 30/30) were performed optimal CRS, reaching completeness of cytoreduction score (CC score), named CC-0 score, and there was no visible residual lesion after operation. While, in the traditional CRS group, 23 patients (77%, 23/30) reached CC-0 score, 5 cases (17%, 6/30) reached CC-1 score, 2 cases (7%, 2/30) reached CC-2 score, and there were statistical significance between the two groups (=0.011). The median surgical time was 315 minutes (range, 252-446 minutes) vs 268 minutes (range, 215-372 minutes), the median intraoperative blood loss was 589 ml (range, 300-900 ml) vs 450 ml (range, 250-800 ml), the median ICU hospital stay time was 2 days (range, 1-7 days) vs 1 day (range, 0-5 days), the median total hospital stay time was 14 days (range, 9-17 days) vs 12 days (range, 7-15 days). There were no statistical significance between the two groups (all >0.05). (3) Surgical complications: there were respectively 5 cases (17%, 5/30) and 3 cases (10%, 3/30) complications with Clavien-Dindo grading Ⅰ-Ⅱ, which was significant no difference between the "rolled carpet" CRS group and the traditional CRS groups (>0.05). No re-operations were needed and the operative mortality was 0. It is safe and feasible to perform "rolled carpet" CRS in patients with advanced stage Ⅲc EOC with peritoneum implantation and metastasis, which could achieve optimal CRS, and has an acceptable incidence of perioperative complications, no perioperative death.
介绍Ⅲc期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)行广泛性腹膜切除术(“卷地毯”式手术)的细胞减灭术(CRS)技术要点,并通过分析手术并发症发生率和围手术期死亡率评估该手术的可行性和安全性。收集2017年12月至2019年12月在四川省肿瘤医院同期行“卷地毯”式CRS的30例Ⅲc期EOC患者及30例行传统CRS的患者。总结“卷地毯”式CRS手术技术要点,即以外腹膜间隙作为卵巢癌手术的切割路径,将盆腔内肿瘤从盆腔外腹膜间隙游离,完整切除盆腔内肿瘤及壁腹膜上所有种植灶或潜在转移灶。回顾性分析两组患者的临床病理特征,通过比较两组手术相关指标及手术并发症发生情况评估“卷地毯”式CRS的可行性和安全性。(1)临床病理特征:“卷地毯”式CRS组与传统CRS组患者年龄分别为(55.4±9.6)岁和(54.6±9.5)岁,腹膜癌指数(PCI)中位数分别为12(范围4~24)和10(范围5~18),两组间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。(2)手术相关指标:“卷地毯”式CRS组所有患者(100%,30/30)均行理想CRS,达到细胞减灭评分(CC评分)为CC-0分,术后无可见残留病灶;而传统CRS组23例(77%,23/30)达到CC-0分,5例(17%,6/30)达到CC-1分,2例(7%,2/30)达到CC-2分,两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.011)。中位手术时间分别为315分钟(范围252~446分钟)和268分钟(范围215~372分钟),中位术中出血量分别为589 ml(范围300~900 ml)和450 ml(范围250~800 ml),中位ICU住院时间分别为2天(范围1~7天)和1天(范围0~5天),中位总住院时间分别为14天(范围9~17天)和12天(范围7~15天),两组间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。(3)手术并发症:“卷地毯”式CRS组与传统CRS组Clavien-Dindo分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级并发症分别有5例(17%,5/30)和3例(10%,3/30),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),均无需再次手术,手术死亡率为0。对伴有腹膜种植转移的晚期Ⅲc期EOC患者行“卷地毯”式CRS安全可行,可实现理想CRS,围手术期并发症发生率可接受,无围手术期死亡。