School of Medicine, Sydney, The University of Notre Dame, 160 Oxford Street, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia. Email:
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia. Email:
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Feb;45(1):36-41. doi: 10.1071/AH20027.
Objectives This study estimated the frequency of ultrasounds ordered for clinically obvious inguinal hernias in patients referred to surgeons and evaluated the clinical value of ultrasonography for this patient population. Methods The present study was a prospective diagnostic and therapeutic impact study conducted in district, rural and tertiary referral hospitals in Sydney, Hawkesbury and Wagga Wagga, Australia. The study included adult patients (≥18 years of age) who had been referred to one of the participating surgeons for an elective inguinal hernia repair. The study determined the proportion of: (1) patients who underwent an inguinal hernia repair for a clinically obvious hernia and also had an ultrasound; (2) ultrasounds ordered by general practitioners (GPs); and (3) these ultrasounds that altered diagnosis and consequent surgical management from the surgeon's perspective. Results In all, 144 participants were included in this study. Of these patients, 134 had a clinically apparent inguinal hernia on physical examination, and 63 of 133 patients (47%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 39-56%) underwent an ultrasound (information was missing for one patient). Overall 68 ultrasounds were ordered, with 63 ordered by GPs. Following the ultrasound, surgeons reported that one patient (1%; 95% CI 0-8 patients) had an altered diagnosis, and five patients (8%; 95% CI 3-17 patients) had altered management. Conclusion This study found that almost one in two patients referred to a surgeon with a clinically obvious inguinal hernia also underwent a groin ultrasound. These studies represent an unnecessary waste of limited healthcare resources and low-value medical care because they rarely affect the final diagnosis or surgical management. What is known about the topic? Inguinal hernias are one of the most common presenting complaints to surgeons in Australia. Currently, there are no accepted Australian guidelines for the diagnosis of inguinal hernias. Ultrasound investigation has been shown to aid diagnosis when there is uncertainty after physical examination. There is increasing concern regarding low-value medical care that contributes to a significant waste of healthcare resources within Australia. The use of ultrasounds for the diagnosis of clinically apparent inguinal hernias is a potential area of concern. What does this paper add? This paper is the first to estimate the frequency of ultrasounds being ordered for clinically apparent inguinal hernias. The study shows that approximately one in two patients who present to surgeons with a clinically obvious inguinal hernia have an ultrasound. GPs were the major referral source for these ultrasounds. Finally, these ultrasounds rarely altered final diagnosis or management for patients who presented to surgeons for definitive management. What are the implications for practitioners? This study confirms that ultrasounds for clinically obvious inguinal hernias represent low-value medical care. Based on the results of this study, it is estimated that the cost to Medicare for unnecessary ultrasounds is approximately A$2.5 million per annum. Although it is beyond the scope of the present study to comment on the reasons for the apparent overinvestigation of ultrasounds for inguinal hernias, the findings suggest that clinical guidelines may help address this problem.
目的 本研究估计了临床明显腹股沟疝患者转至外科医生后进行超声检查的频率,并评估了超声检查对该患者人群的临床价值。
方法 本研究是在澳大利亚悉尼、霍克斯伯里和沃加沃加的地区、农村和三级转诊医院进行的前瞻性诊断和治疗影响研究。研究纳入了转诊至参与研究的外科医生处行择期腹股沟疝修补术的成年患者(≥18 岁)。研究确定了以下各项的比例:(1)因临床明显疝行腹股沟疝修补术且行超声检查的患者;(2)全科医生(GP)开具的超声检查单;(3)从外科医生角度看,这些超声检查是否改变了诊断和后续手术管理。
结果 共有 144 名患者参与了本研究。其中,134 名患者体格检查时存在临床明显腹股沟疝,133 名患者中有 63 名(47%;95%置信区间(CI)39-56%)进行了超声检查(1 名患者的信息缺失)。总共开具了 68 份超声检查单,其中 63 份由 GP 开具。外科医生报告称,1 名患者(1%;95%CI 0-8 名患者)的诊断发生改变,5 名患者(8%;95%CI 3-17 名患者)的治疗发生改变。
结论 本研究发现,临床明显腹股沟疝转至外科医生处的患者中,近 1/2 患者还接受了腹股沟超声检查。这些研究代表了对有限医疗资源的不必要浪费和低价值医疗护理,因为它们很少影响最终诊断或手术管理。
关于该主题,已知的情况是什么?腹股沟疝是澳大利亚外科医生最常见的就诊原因之一。目前,澳大利亚尚无公认的腹股沟疝诊断指南。体格检查后存在不确定性时,超声检查有助于辅助诊断。人们越来越关注低价值医疗护理,因为这会导致澳大利亚大量浪费医疗资源。超声检查用于诊断临床明显的腹股沟疝可能是一个令人关注的潜在领域。
本文的新增内容是什么?本文首次估计了为临床明显腹股沟疝开具超声检查单的频率。该研究表明,约有 1/2 的因临床明显腹股沟疝就诊的患者会接受超声检查。这些超声检查主要由 GP 开具。最后,对于就诊外科医生以接受确定性治疗的患者,这些超声检查很少改变最终诊断或管理。
对从业者的意义是什么?本研究证实,临床明显腹股沟疝的超声检查代表了低价值的医疗护理。根据本研究的结果,估计不必要的超声检查每年给医疗保险带来的费用约为 2500 万澳元。尽管本研究的范围无法评论超声检查治疗腹股沟疝过度检查的原因,但研究结果表明,临床指南可能有助于解决这一问题。