Suppr超能文献

艾塞那肽与门冬胰岛素 30 在二甲双胍单药治疗血糖控制不佳的中国 2 型糖尿病患者中的血糖变异性比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机试验

Comparison of Blood Glucose Variability Between Exenatide and Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Chinese Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin Monotherapy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Wang Li, Liu Xiangyang, Yang Wenjuan, Lai Jingbo, Yu Xinwen, Liu Jianrong, Gao Xiling, Ming Jie, Ma Kaiyan, Xu Jing, Tian Zhufang, He Qingzhen, Ji Qiuhe

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Endocrinology, Shaanxi Aerospace Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2020 Oct;11(10):2313-2328. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00904-z. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To compare blood glucose variability (GV) in Chinese participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) whose blood glucose levels are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy after twice-daily exenatide or biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp30).

METHODS

In this 16-week multicenter, randomized clinical trial, 104 participants were randomized 1:1 to receive exenatide (exenatide group) or BIAsp30 (BIAsp30 group) twice daily. All participants continued metformin treatment. The primary outcome was the change in GV as measured by a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) from baseline to 16 weeks.

RESULTS

At 16 weeks, both the Exenatide and BIAsp30 groups effectively decreased mean glucose (MG), but neither group changed the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), largest amplitude of glycemic excursion (LAGE), mean of daily difference (MODD), or standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG). The decrease in 2-h post-breakfast glucose excursions was greater in the Exenatide group compared to the BIAsp30 group, with a least square (LS) mean difference [95% CI] of (1.58 [0.53, 2.63]). Exenatide also significantly reduced 2-h post-lunch glucose excursion compared to BIAsp30 (LS mean difference [95% CI], 1.19 [0.18, 2.20]). The Exenatide group had significantly reduced body weight and body mass index (BMI), while the BIAsp30 group had increased weight and had no change in BMI. Both treatments were well tolerated with no serious hypoglycemic events and with fewer identified hypoglycemic events in the Exenatide group than in the BIAsp30 group (5.77% vs. 17.31%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Although there was no difference in change of GV between Exenatide and BIAsp30, exenatide provided more improvement in postprandial glucose excursion and weight control, without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia in Chinese patients with T2DM whose blood glucose was inadequately controlled with metformin. These findings may provide new options for patients who choose further hypoglycemic treatment, especially in patients with obesity who have large postprandial plasma glucose excursions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov indentifier: NCT02449603.

摘要

引言

比较接受每日两次艾塞那肽或双相门冬胰岛素30(BIAsp30)治疗后血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病(T2DM)中国患者的血糖变异性(GV)。

方法

在这项为期16周的多中心随机临床试验中,104名参与者按1:1随机分组,分别接受每日两次的艾塞那肽(艾塞那肽组)或BIAsp30(BIAsp30组)治疗。所有参与者继续接受二甲双胍治疗。主要结局是通过连续血糖监测系统(CGMS)测量的从基线到16周的GV变化。

结果

在16周时,艾塞那肽组和BIAsp30组均有效降低了平均血糖(MG),但两组均未改变血糖波动平均幅度(MAGE)、最大血糖波动幅度(LAGE)、每日血糖差值均值(MODD)或血糖标准差(SDBG)。与BIAsp30组相比,艾塞那肽组早餐后2小时血糖波动降低幅度更大,最小二乘(LS)均值差[95%CI]为(1.58[0.53,2.63])。与BIAsp30相比,艾塞那肽还显著降低了午餐后2小时血糖波动(LS均值差[95%CI],1.19[0.18,2.20])。艾塞那肽组体重和体重指数(BMI)显著降低,而BIAsp30组体重增加且BMI无变化。两种治疗耐受性良好,均未发生严重低血糖事件,且艾塞那肽组低血糖事件发生率低于BIAsp30组(5.77%对17.31%,P<0.01)。

结论

虽然艾塞那肽和BIAsp30在GV变化方面无差异,但艾塞那肽在餐后血糖波动和体重控制方面改善更多,且不会增加二甲双胍血糖控制不佳的中国T2DM患者的低血糖风险。这些发现可能为选择进一步降糖治疗的患者提供新的选择方案,尤其是对于餐后血糖波动较大的肥胖患者。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02449603。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68f/7509011/00f79f89625f/13300_2020_904_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验