Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Wake Forest University Center for Injury Biomechanics, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020 Oct 12;21(sup1):S72-S77. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1802021. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
While well-protected through a variety of safety countermeasures, motorsports drivers can be exposed to a large variety of crash modes and severities. Computational human body models (HBMs) are currently used to assess occupant safety for the general driving public in production vehicles. The purpose of this study was to incorporate a HBM into a motorsport environment using a simulation-based approach and provide quantitative data on relative risk for on-track motorsport crashes.
Unlike a traditional automotive seat, the NASCAR driver environment is driver-customized and form-fitting. A multi-step process was developed to integrate the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) 50th percentile male simplified occupant into a representative motorsport environment which includes a donned helmet, a 7-point safety belt system, head and neck restraint (HNR), poured-foam seat, steering wheel, and leg enclosure. A series of 45 representative impacts, developed from real-world crash data, of varying severity (10 kph ≤ Δ ≤ 100 kph) and impact direction (∼290° ≤ PDOF ≤ 20°) were conducted with the GHBMC 50th percentile male simplified occupant (M50-OS v2.2). Kinematic and kinetic data, and a variety of injury criteria, were output from each of the simulations and used to calculate AIS 1+, 2+, and 3+ injury risk. All simulations were conducted in LS-Dyna R. 9.1.
Injury risk of the occupant using the previously mentioned injury criteria was calculated for the head, neck, thorax, and lower extremity, and the probability of injury for each region was plotted. Of the simulated impacts, five had a maximum AIS 1+ injury risk >20%, six had a maximum AIS 2+ injury risk >10%, and no cases had a maximum AIS 3+ injury >1%. Overall, injury risk estimates were reasonable compared to on-track data reported from Patalak et al. (2020).
Beyond injury risk, the study is the first of its kind to provide mechanical loading values likely experienced during motorsports crash incidents with crash pulses developed from real-world data. Given the severity of the crash pulses, the simulated environments reinforce the need for the robust safety environment implemented by NASCAR.
赛车手虽然通过各种安全措施得到了很好的保护,但仍可能面临各种碰撞模式和严重程度的风险。目前,计算人体模型(HBM)用于评估生产车辆中普通驾驶员的乘员安全性。本研究的目的是使用基于模拟的方法将 HBM 纳入赛车环境,并提供赛道赛车事故相对风险的定量数据。
与传统汽车座椅不同,NASCAR 赛车手的环境是根据赛车手的需求定制的,贴合赛车手的身体。开发了一个多步骤的过程,将全球人体模型联合会(GHBMC)第 50 百分位男性简化乘员集成到一个代表性的赛车环境中,该环境包括佩戴的头盔、7 点安全带系统、头颈部约束装置(HNR)、浇注泡沫座椅、方向盘和腿部保护装置。使用 GHBMC 第 50 百分位男性简化乘员(M50-OS v2.2)进行了一系列 45 个具有不同严重程度(10 kph≤Δ≤100 kph)和不同碰撞方向(∼290°≤PDOF≤20°)的代表性碰撞的模拟。从每个模拟中输出运动学和动力学数据以及各种损伤标准,并用于计算 AIS 1+、2+和 3+损伤风险。所有模拟均在 LS-Dyna R.9.1 中进行。
使用上述损伤标准计算了乘员头部、颈部、胸部和下肢的损伤风险,并绘制了每个区域的损伤概率图。在模拟的碰撞中,有 5 次最大 AIS 1+损伤风险>20%,6 次最大 AIS 2+损伤风险>10%,没有最大 AIS 3+损伤>1%的情况。总体而言,与 Patalak 等人(2020 年)报告的赛道数据相比,损伤风险估计是合理的。
除了损伤风险外,该研究还是首次提供了基于真实数据开发的赛道事故中机械加载值的研究,这些数据来自碰撞脉冲。考虑到碰撞脉冲的严重程度,模拟环境强化了 NASCAR 实施的强大安全环境的必要性。