Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany (member of the CAPNETZ Foundation).
Respiratory Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1912-1918. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.07.089. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
In 2019, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) issued a substantial revision of the 2007 guideline on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Despite the fact that generalization of infectious disease guidelines is limited because of substantial geographic differences in microbiologic etiology and antimicrobial resistance, the ATS/IDSA guideline is frequently applied outside the United States. Therefore, this project aimed to give a perspective on the ATS/IDSA CAP recommendations related to the management of CAP outside the United States. For this, an expert panel composed of 14 international key opinion leaders in the field of CAP from 10 countries across five continents, who were not involved in producing the 2019 guideline, was asked to subjectively name the five most useful changes, the recommendation viewed most critically, and the recommendation that cannot be applied to their respective region. There was no formal consensus process, and the article reflects different opinions. Recommendations welcomed by most of the international pneumonia experts included the abandonment of the concept of "health-care-associated pneumonia," the more restrictive indication for empiric macrolide treatment in outpatients, the increased emphasis on microbiologic diagnostics, and addressing the use of corticosteroids. Main criticisms included the somewhat arbitrary choice of a 25% resistance threshold for outpatient macrolide monotherapy. Experts from areas with elevated mycobacterial prevalence particularly opposed the recommendation of fluoroquinolones, even as an alternative.
2019 年,美国胸科学会(ATS)和美国传染病学会(IDSA)对 2007 年社区获得性肺炎(CAP)指南进行了重大修订。尽管由于微生物病因和抗菌药物耐药性在地理上存在很大差异,传染病指南的推广受到限制,但 ATS/IDSA 指南经常在美国以外的国家使用。因此,本项目旨在就 ATS/IDSA CAP 建议在除美国以外的国家管理 CAP 提供一些观点。为此,一个由来自五大洲 10 个国家的 CAP 领域的 14 名国际知名专家组成的专家小组被要求主观地命名五个最有用的变化、被认为最关键的建议以及无法应用于各自地区的建议。没有正式的共识过程,本文反映了不同的观点。最受国际肺炎专家欢迎的建议包括放弃“医疗保健相关性肺炎”的概念、更严格限制门诊经验性大环内酯类药物治疗的适应证、更加重视微生物诊断学以及解决皮质类固醇的使用问题。主要批评包括对门诊大环内酯类单药治疗的 25%耐药率的选择有些随意。分枝杆菌流行率较高地区的专家特别反对氟喹诺酮类药物的推荐,即使将其作为替代药物。