Suppr超能文献

促甲状腺激素受体抗体(TRAb)免疫分析的分析性能评估。

Analytical performance evaluation of thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb) immunoassays.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Biochem. 2020 Dec;86:56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR)-activating autoantibodies stimulate thyroid growth and hormone synthesis/secretion, causing hyperthyroidism of Graves' disease (GD). TRAb measurement helps diagnose GD and is an important first test in evaluating hyperthyroidism according to the recent American Thyroid Association guidelines. We compared the performance of the BRAHMS TRAK Kryptor (Thermo Scientific) and Roche cobas TRAb immunoassays for use in GD.

METHOD

Method comparison (n = 40) and clinical agreement were assessed between the Kryptor, cobas e411, and cobas e601. The analytical performance of Kryptor and cobas e411 were assessed for within- and between-day imprecision across 20 days, linearity, functional assay sensitivity (FAS), dilution recovery, and cut-off verification.

RESULTS

The Kryptor, e411, and e601 TRAb immunoassays correlated well (r > 0.95, overall percent agreement = 0.95, Cohen's kappa = 0.90). With a total allowable error of 20%, percent bias was within 13%, which was minimally negative at <20 IU/L, but highly positive (33%-34%) >20 IU/L. The Kryptor, but not e411, was linear across the claimed analytical measuring range (AMR). The claimed functional assay sensitivity (FAS), which was close to the clinical GD cut-off 1.8 IU/L, was verified for Kryptor and e411.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our evaluation demonstrates acceptable comparability between TRAb immunoassays with in-house imprecision up to 13% and 10% on Kryptor and e411, respectively. While Roche has preferable calibration frequency and on-board reagent stability, both platforms demonstrate acceptable imprecision using patient samples at their claimed FAS, which is important for GD diagnosis. Diluted results (using a negative patient pool as diluent) exhibits proportional positive bias on the Kryptor relative to the Roche methods.

摘要

背景

促甲状腺激素受体(TSHR)激活自身抗体刺激甲状腺生长和激素合成/分泌,导致 Graves 病(GD)的甲状腺功能亢进。TRAb 测量有助于诊断 GD,并且根据最近的美国甲状腺协会指南,是评估甲状腺功能亢进的重要初始测试。我们比较了 BRAHMS TRAK Kryptor(赛默飞世尔科技)和罗氏 cobas TRAb 免疫测定法在 GD 中的应用。

方法

我们评估了 Kryptor、cobas e411 和 cobas e601 之间的方法比较(n=40)和临床一致性。我们在 20 天内评估了 Kryptor 和 cobas e411 的批内和批间精密度、线性、功能测定灵敏度(FAS)、稀释恢复和截止值验证。

结果

Kryptor、e411 和 e601 TRAb 免疫测定法相关性良好(r>0.95,总符合率=0.95,Cohen's kappa=0.90)。在总允许误差为 20%的情况下,偏差百分比在 13%以内,在<20 IU/L 时略为负值,但在>20 IU/L 时为高度正值(33%-34%)。Kryptor 是线性的,而不是 e411,在声称的分析测量范围内(AMR)。Kryptor 和 e411 验证了接近临床 GD 截止值 1.8 IU/L 的声称功能测定灵敏度(FAS)。

结论

总的来说,我们的评估表明,TRAb 免疫测定法具有可接受的可比性,室内精密度分别高达 13%和 10%,在各自声称的 FAS 下使用患者样本,Kryptor 和 e411 均具有可接受的精密度,这对 GD 诊断很重要。稀释结果(使用阴性患者群体作为稀释剂)在 Kryptor 相对于罗氏方法表现出比例性正偏差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验