DaCHE, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløw vej 9, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Research Unit of General Practice, Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløw vej 9, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 26;17(17):6185. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176185.
Point-of-care testing (POCT) of HbA1c means instant test results and more coherent counseling that is expected to improve diabetes management and affect ambulatory visits and hospitalizations. From late 2008, POCT has been implemented and adopted by a segment of the general practices in the capital region of Denmark. The aim of this study is to assess whether the introduction of POCT of HbA1c in general practice (GP) has affected patient outcomes for T2 diabetes patients in terms of hospital activity. We apply difference-in-differences models at the GP clinic level to assess the casual effects of POCT on the following hospital outcomes: (1) admissions for diabetes, (2) admissions for ambulatory care sensitive diabetes conditions (ACSCs), (3) ambulatory visits for diabetes. The use of POCT is remunerated by a fee, and registration of this fee is used to measure the GP's use of POCT. The control group includes clinics from the same region that did not use POCT. The sensitivity of our results is assessed by an event study approach and a range of robustness tests. The panel data set includes 553 GP clinics and approximately 30,000 diabetes patients from the capital region of Denmark, observed in the years 2004-2012. We find that voluntary adoption of POCT of HbA1c in GP has no effect on hospital admissions and diabetes-related hospital ambulatory visits. Event study analysis and different treatment definitions confirm the robustness of these results. If implementation of POCT of HbA1c improves other parts of diabetes management as indicated in the literature, it seems worthwhile to implement POCT of HbA1c in the capital region of Denmark. However, doubts around the quality of POCT of HbA1c testing and a desire to capture data at central labs may prevent implementation of more value based HbA1c testing.
即时检测 HbA1c 的即时检测结果和更连贯的咨询有望改善糖尿病管理,并影响门诊和住院治疗。自 2008 年末以来,丹麦首都地区的一部分全科医生已实施并采用即时检测 HbA1c。本研究旨在评估在全科医生中引入即时检测 HbA1c 是否会影响 T2 糖尿病患者的住院治疗结果,即:(1)糖尿病住院率,(2)因门诊治疗敏感型糖尿病住院率,(3)糖尿病门诊就诊率。即时检测的使用会产生费用,该费用的登记用来衡量全科医生使用即时检测的情况。对照组包括来自同一地区但未使用即时检测的诊所。我们使用事件研究法和一系列稳健性检验来评估结果的敏感性。面板数据集包括丹麦首都地区的 553 个全科医生诊所和约 30000 名糖尿病患者,观察时间为 2004 年至 2012 年。我们发现,全科医生自愿采用即时检测 HbA1c 对住院和糖尿病相关的门诊就诊没有影响。事件研究分析和不同的治疗定义确认了这些结果的稳健性。如果如文献所述,即时检测 HbA1c 的实施改善了糖尿病管理的其他方面,那么在丹麦首都地区实施即时检测 HbA1c 似乎是值得的。然而,即时检测 HbA1c 检测质量方面的疑虑以及在中央实验室获取数据的愿望可能会阻止基于价值的 HbA1c 检测的实施。