• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Transradial versus transfemoral approach in STEMI: Choice is with the operator.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中经桡动脉与经股动脉途径：选择取决于操作者。
Indian Heart J. 2020 Jul-Aug;72(4):327-328. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
2
Controversies in the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach.ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理中的争议：桡动脉途径与股动脉途径
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2016 Oct;5(4):513-522. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
3
Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: insight from the CREDO-Kyoto AMI registry.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时经桡动脉与经股动脉途径的比较：来自CREDO-Kyoto急性心肌梗死注册研究的见解
Heart Vessels. 2017 Dec;32(12):1448-1457. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-1021-4. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
Post-the SAFARI STEMI study: Is there still a debate on radial vs. femoral access in STEMI?SAFARI STEMI 研究之后：STEMI 患者中桡动脉入路与股动脉入路的争论是否仍存在？
Indian Heart J. 2020 Sep-Oct;72(5):466-468. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Transradial versus transfemoral access for female patients who underwent primary PCI in STEMI: Two years follow-up data from acute STEMI interventional registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时经桡动脉与经股动脉入路：急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死介入登记研究的两年随访数据
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Aug;217 Suppl:S16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.222. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
6
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar;14(3):e009994. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009994. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
7
Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.英国经溶栓治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中穿刺部位操作对临床结局的影响：来自英国心血管介入学会数据集的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 27;10(22):2258-2265. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.049.
8
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation.经桡动脉与股动脉入路在急性冠状动脉综合征伴或不伴 ST 段抬高患者中的比较。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 7;38(14):1069-1080. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx048.
9
Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：对当前证据体系的再评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.003.
10
Cost-effectiveness of radial vs. femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI - Randomized, control trial.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉入路的成本效益——随机对照试验
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2016 May-Jun;57(3):198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Radial or femoral access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): Does the choice matters?经桡动脉或股动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）：选择重要吗？
Indian Heart J. 2020 May-Jun;72(3):166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 21.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Femoral Access vs Radial Access in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The SAFARI-STEMI Randomized Clinical Trial.股动脉入路与桡动脉入路在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的安全性和疗效：SAFARI-STEMI 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Feb 1;5(2):126-134. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4852.
3
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉与股动脉入路的随机多中心试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
4
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial.多中心随机临床试验中经桡动脉或股动脉途径治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死：STEMI-RADIAL 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 18;63(10):964-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1651. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
5
Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study.桡动脉入路与股动脉入路随机对照在 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的研究：RIFLE-STEACS（ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的桡动脉入路与股动脉入路随机对照研究）。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
6
Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的随机、平行分组、多中心试验（RIVAL）
Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1409-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2. Epub 2011 Apr 4.

Transradial versus transfemoral approach in STEMI: Choice is with the operator.

作者信息

Deora Surender

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.

出版信息

Indian Heart J. 2020 Jul-Aug;72(4):327-328. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ihj.2020.06.006
PMID:32861397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7474099/
Abstract
摘要