Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebin El kom, Egypt.
Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Surgery. 2020 Dec;168(6):1160-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.023. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
Liver transplantation in the setting of portal vein thrombosis is an intricate issue that occasionally necessitates extraordinary procedures for portal flow restoration. However, to date, there is no consensus on a persistent management strategy, particularly with extensive forms. This work aims to introduce our experience-based surgical management algorithm for portal vein thrombosis during liver transplantation and to clarify some of the debatable circumstances associated with this problematic issue.
Between 2006 and 2019, 494 adults underwent liver transplantation at our institute. Ninety patients had preoperative portal vein thrombosis, and 79 patients underwent living donor liver transplantation. Our algorithm trichotomized the management plan into 3 pathways based on portal vein thrombosis grade. The surgical procedures implemented included thrombectomy, interposition vein grafts, jump grafts from the superior mesenteric vein, jump grafts from a collateral and renoportal anastomosis in 56, 13, 11, 4, and 2 patients, respectively. Four patients with mural thrombi did not require any special intervention.
Thirteen patients experienced posttransplant portal vein complications. They all proved to have a patent portal vein by the end of follow-up regardless of the management modality. No significant survival difference was observed between cohorts with versus without portal vein thrombosis. The early graft loss rate was significantly higher with advanced grades (P = .048) as well as technically demanding procedures (P = .032).
A stepwise broad-minded strategy should always be adopted when approaching advanced portal vein thrombosis during liver transplantation. An industrious preoperative evaluation should always be carried out to locate the ideal reliable source for portal flow restoration.
在门静脉血栓形成的情况下进行肝移植是一个复杂的问题,有时需要进行特殊的门脉血流恢复手术。然而,迄今为止,对于持续的管理策略还没有共识,特别是对于广泛的血栓形成形式。本研究旨在介绍我们在肝移植中治疗门静脉血栓形成的经验性手术管理算法,并阐明与这一棘手问题相关的一些有争议的情况。
2006 年至 2019 年间,我院共有 494 例成人接受肝移植。90 例患者术前有门静脉血栓形成,79 例患者接受活体供肝移植。我们的算法根据门静脉血栓形成的程度将管理方案分为 3 个途径。实施的手术包括血栓切除术、静脉旁路移植术、肠系膜上静脉跳跃移植术、侧支跳跃移植术和肾门静脉吻合术,分别在 56、13、11、4 和 2 例患者中进行。4 例有壁血栓的患者不需要任何特殊干预。
13 例患者发生移植后门静脉并发症。所有患者在随访结束时均证实门静脉通畅,无论采用何种治疗方式。血栓形成组与无血栓形成组之间的生存率无显著差异。高级别(P=0.048)和技术要求较高的手术(P=0.032)的早期移植物失效率显著较高。
在肝移植中处理门静脉血栓形成时,应始终采取分阶段的明智策略。应始终进行详尽的术前评估,以找到门静脉血流恢复的理想可靠来源。