Rugivarodom Manus, Charatcharoenwitthaya Phunchai
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2020 Dec 28;8(4):432-444. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2020.00067. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Nontumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an increasingly recognized complication in patients with cirrhosis. Substantial evidence shows that portal flow stasis, complex thrombophilic disorders, and exogenous factors leading to endothelial dysfunction have emerged as key factors in the pathogenesis of PVT. The contribution of PVT to hepatic decompensation and mortality in cirrhosis is debatable; however, the presence of an advanced PVT increases operative complexity and decreases survival after transplantation. The therapeutic decision for PVT is often determined by the duration and extent of thrombosis, the presence of symptoms, and liver transplant eligibility. Evidence from several cohorts has demonstrated that anticoagulation treatment with vitamin K antagonist or low molecular weight heparin can achieve recanalization of the portal vein, which is associated with a reduction in portal hypertension-related events and improved survival in cirrhotic patients with PVT. Consequently, interest in direct oral anticoagulants for PVT is increasing, but clinical data in cirrhosis are limited. Although the most feared consequence of anticoagulation is bleeding, most studies indicate that anticoagulation therapy for PVT in cirrhosis appears relatively safe. Interestingly, the data showed that transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt represents an effective adjunctive therapy for PVT in cirrhotic patients with symptomatic portal hypertension if anticoagulation is ineffective. Insufficient evidence regarding the optimal timing, modality, and duration of therapy makes nontumoral PVT a challenging consequence of cirrhosis. In this review, we summarize the current literature and provide a potential algorithm for the management of PVT in patients with cirrhosis.
非肿瘤性门静脉血栓形成(PVT)是肝硬化患者中一种日益被认识到的并发症。大量证据表明,门静脉血流淤滞、复杂的血栓形成倾向障碍以及导致内皮功能障碍的外源性因素已成为PVT发病机制中的关键因素。PVT对肝硬化患者肝失代偿和死亡率的影响存在争议;然而,晚期PVT的存在会增加手术复杂性并降低移植后的生存率。PVT的治疗决策通常取决于血栓形成的持续时间和范围、症状的存在以及肝移植的资格。来自多个队列的证据表明,使用维生素K拮抗剂或低分子肝素进行抗凝治疗可实现门静脉再通,这与肝硬化合并PVT患者门静脉高压相关事件的减少和生存率的提高有关。因此,人们对用于PVT的直接口服抗凝剂的兴趣日益增加,但肝硬化方面的临床数据有限。尽管抗凝最令人担忧的后果是出血,但大多数研究表明,肝硬化患者PVT的抗凝治疗似乎相对安全。有趣的是,数据显示,如果抗凝无效,经颈静脉肝内门体分流术是肝硬化合并有症状门静脉高压患者PVT的一种有效辅助治疗方法。关于最佳治疗时机、方式和持续时间的证据不足,使得非肿瘤性PVT成为肝硬化一个具有挑战性的后果。在本综述中,我们总结了当前的文献,并提供了一种肝硬化患者PVT管理的潜在算法。