Berman Jeremy P, Abrams Mark P, Kushnir Alexander, Rubin Geoffrey A, Ehlert Frederick, Biviano Angelo, Morrow John P, Dizon Jose, Wan Elaine Y, Yarmohammadi Hirad, Waase Marc P, Rubin David A, Garan Hasan, Saluja Deepak
Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2020 Nov-Dec;20(6):250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly altered the practice of cardiac electrophysiology around the world for the foreseeable future. Professional organizations have provided guidance for practitioners, but real-world examples of the consults and responsibilities cardiac electrophysiologists face during a surge of COVID-19 patients is lacking.
In this observational case series we report on 29 consecutive inpatient electrophysiology consultations at a major academic medical center in New York City, the epicenter of the pandemic in the United States, during a 2 week period from March 30-April 12, 2020, when 80% of hospital beds were occupied by COVID-19 patients, and the New York City metropolitan area accounted for 10% of COVID-19 cases worldwide.
Reasons for consultation included: Atrial tachyarrhythmia (31%), cardiac implantable electronic device management (28%), bradycardia (14%), QTc prolongation (10%), ventricular arrhythmia (7%), post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement conduction abnormality (3.5%), ventricular pre-excitation (3.5%), and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (3.5%). Twenty-four patients (86%) were positive for COVID-19 by nasopharyngeal swab. All elective procedures were canceled, and only one urgent device implantation was performed. Thirteen patients (45%) required in-person evaluation and the remainder were managed remotely.
Our experience shows that the application of a massive alteration in workflow and personnel forced by the pandemic allowed our team to efficiently address the intersection of COVID-19 with a range of electrophysiology issues. This experience will prove useful as guidance for emerging hot spots or areas affected by future waves of the pandemic.
在可预见的未来,新冠疫情极大地改变了全球心脏电生理学的实践。专业组织已为从业者提供了指导,但缺乏心脏电生理学家在新冠患者激增期间所面临的会诊及职责的实际案例。
在这个观察性病例系列中,我们报告了2020年3月30日至4月12日为期2周的时间里,在纽约市一家主要学术医疗中心进行的29例连续住院患者的电生理会诊情况。纽约市是美国疫情的中心,当时80%的医院床位被新冠患者占用,纽约市大都市区的新冠病例占全球的10%。
会诊原因包括:房性快速心律失常(31%)、心脏植入式电子设备管理(28%)、心动过缓(14%)、QTc延长(10%)、室性心律失常(7%)、经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导异常(3.5%)、心室预激(3.5%)和阵发性室上性心动过速(3.5%)。24例患者(86%)鼻咽拭子新冠病毒检测呈阳性。所有择期手术均被取消,仅进行了1例紧急设备植入。13例患者(45%)需要进行面对面评估,其余患者通过远程方式管理。
我们的经验表明,疫情迫使工作流程和人员发生的巨大改变使我们的团队能够有效地应对新冠疫情与一系列电生理问题的交叉情况。这一经验将作为新兴热点地区或受未来疫情浪潮影响地区的指导,具有实用价值。